Background & Aims
Published estimates for the rate of progression from Barrett’s esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) vary. We used simulation modeling to reconcile published data and more accurately estimate the incidence of EAC among people with BE.
Methods
We calibrated the ERASMUS/UW model for EAC to match the 0.18% annual rate of progression from population-based studies. This model was then used to simulate the design of prospective studies, introducing more endoscopic surveillance. We used the model to predict rates of progression for both types of studies and for different periods of follow up, and compared the predicted rates with published data.
Results
For the first 5 y of follow up, the model reproduced the 0.19% average annual rate of progression observed in population-based studies; the same disease model predicted a 0.36% annual rate of progression in studies with a prospective design (0.41% reported in published articles). After 20 y these rates each increased to 0.63%–0.65% annually, corresponding with a 9.1%–9.5% cumulative cancer incidence. Between these periods, the difference between the progression rates of both study designs decreased from 91% to 5%.
Conclusions
In the first 5 y after diagnosis, the rate of progression from BE to EAC is likely to more closely approximate the lower estimates reported from population-based studies than the higher estimates reported from prospective studies, in which EAC is detected by surveillance. Clinicians should use this information to explain to patients their short-term and long-term risk if no action is taken, and then discuss the risks and benefits of surveillance.