“…org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.003). 4,5,9,21,45,[48][49][50][51] Although Ki-67 index is considered a promising prognostic marker by the whole author panel, its technique of evaluation and the most accurate thresholds remain a matter of debate; moreover, no definitive validation of its added value to WHO and pTNM classifications has been provided so far in large series of LCs. 18,28,45,52,53 At the metastatic stage, WHO classification, performance status, CgA levels, tumour burden and somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) uptake, as well as tumour growth slope and the functioning syndrome, should be taken into account for adequate risk assessment [IV, B].…”