The functional response is one of the most widely measured attributes of consumers. Phenomenalistic descriptions of how predator attack rates vary with prey density are fundamental components of consumer-resource models. The application of these functions typically assumes continuous foraging by individuals, along with stationarity in their behavioural and physiological processes. Yet most species display a diurnal cycle in foraging and resting, and the impact of this foraging pattern on the functional response is unknown.We use a physiologically structured or 'state-space' approach to examine how the daily foraging cycle affects the temporal dynamics of attack rates and the functional response of parasitoids (Aphytis melinus) and predators (Mantis crassulea and fishes). The state spaces for parasitoids and predators are the number of mature eggs, the eggload, and the satiation level, respectively. The corresponding rates are those of egg maturation and oviposition on one hand, and digestion and prey capture on the other hand.We show that the length of the foraging period alters both the shape of the functional response and the magnitude of attack rates, compared to a daily functional response proportional to the time spent foraging, as is classically done. Our models reveal how separation of time-scales arises between behavioural or physiological and lifetime processes, and the difficulty in resolving such separation once the new time scale of a foraging cycle is introduced.Foragers in many environments, either because of exposure to low resource density or constrained by short foraging windows, cannot achieve the behavioural or physiological stationarity assumed in classical analyses. This introduces a fundamental mixture of time-scales that has significant effects on estimates of attack rates. Using a population-level model of predators and prey, we show how restricted periods of daily foraging have important dynamical consequences both in terms of equilibrium levels and return times to these equilibria.The functional response of predators, parasitoids, and more generally of consumers, has been studied for a large number of species (extensively reviewed by Jeschke et al. 2002, Keeling et al. 2000, Fernandez-Arhex and Corley 2003, Hobbs et al. 2003, Fryxell et al. 2007, Tschanz et al. 2007, Englund and Leonardsson 2008. Behavioral ecologists are fascinated by how individuals search, detect and capture prey as the density of these resources varies in quantity or quality in different environmental settings. Physiological ecologists use these relationships to understand energy acquisition and allocation, thereby linking physiological processes to resource levels in the environment. Population and community ecologists use the functional response to infer mortality rates imposed on prey, and also as a key component to dynamically couple prey and predator populations in models of predator-prey systems or foodwebs (Fryxell and Lundberg 1997, Murdoch et al. 2003, Turchin 2003. The study of functional responses thus sp...