Screening is a public health service wherein people of a defined population, who do not perceive that they are at risk for, or are already affected by, a disease or its complications, are asked a question or offered a test. This process identifies those who are more likely to be helped than harmed by further tests or treatment and reduces the risk of a disease or its complications.• As screening targets apparently healthy people, it has important ethical differences from clinical practice. Screening methods are not hundred percent safe and it is important that physicians and the lay public recognize this. A balance between safety and sensitivity has to be maintained. Screening has the potential to save lives or improve quality of life through early diagnosis of serious conditions, by reducing the risk of developing a condition or its complications. Screening cannot be taken as a guarantee of complete protection. In any screening program, there is an irreducible minimum of false positive results and false negative results. Screening should be considered risk reduction rather than risk elimination 1 . Following the discussion for the screening of individual cancers the statement of the National Cancer Institute (www. nci.nih.gov) is mentioned.
Screening of Gastric CancerScreening of gastric cancer in asymptomatic persons may increase the chance of detecting early cancer and hence may improve the overall survival. In a study from Japan,a screening program of gastric cancer using seven -film photofluorography followed by endoscopic biopsies in suspicious cases, found that 40 % to 60 % of cancers diagnosed were early cancer, with no lymphatic metastasis. 2 This program has been attributed as one of the reasons for the decline in stomach cancer morality in Japan. However, a formal randomized study to evaluate the effectiveness of this screening strategy is lacking.As the incidence of gastric carcinoma in many developed countries is low, routine population based screening program cannot be adopted. In these countries, screening may be targeted to high -risk persons only, e.g. those with family history of gastric cancer, chronic atrophic gastritis, previous gastric surgery, or pernicious anemia.Biochemical markers to identify those at risk of developing gastric carcinoma include low serum pepsinogen I, which correlates with corpus atrophy, has been found to be significantly associated with C h a p t e r 3 7Screening for Gastrointestinal Cancers-An Overview
Summary of Evidence by The National Cancer InstituteThere is insufficient evidence to establish that screening would result in a decrease in mortality from gastric cancer in the U.S. population. Endoscopy is sometimes used to screen for gastric cancer. There are serious but uncommon side effects associated with endoscopy, which may include the following: perforation, cardiopulmonary events, aspiration pneumonia, and bleeding requiring hospitalization.
Screening for Esophageal CancerHigh -incidence areas, such as in northern China, may merit endoscopic screening in t...