2010
DOI: 10.1134/s1062359010050158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural hybridization of two mussel species Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771) and Dreissena bugensis (Andrusov, 1897)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for this is that some mollusk (cryptic) invasive and native species show similar shell morphology due to their close relationships and phenotypic plasticity (Morais and Reichard, 2018). Some of the local species may also be impacted by hybridization with invasive sister species in semi-reproductive isolation (Harrison and Larson, 2014), which is facilitated by high fecundity and dispersal potential in broadcast-spawning aquatic mollusks Dreissena, Crassostrea, and Mytilus species (Voroshilova et al, 2010;Fraïsse et al, 2016;Gagnaire et al, 2018). Mollusk shell DNA is a useful tool to assess the presence and genomic landscape of invaders at given points in time and space.…”
Section: Potential Of Ancient Mollusk Dna For Studying Biological Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this is that some mollusk (cryptic) invasive and native species show similar shell morphology due to their close relationships and phenotypic plasticity (Morais and Reichard, 2018). Some of the local species may also be impacted by hybridization with invasive sister species in semi-reproductive isolation (Harrison and Larson, 2014), which is facilitated by high fecundity and dispersal potential in broadcast-spawning aquatic mollusks Dreissena, Crassostrea, and Mytilus species (Voroshilova et al, 2010;Fraïsse et al, 2016;Gagnaire et al, 2018). Mollusk shell DNA is a useful tool to assess the presence and genomic landscape of invaders at given points in time and space.…”
Section: Potential Of Ancient Mollusk Dna For Studying Biological Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the comparative studies, the morphological criterion is chosen to identify the two species. However, the two species show high morphological similarities [97,98] that prevent from morphological consistent species identification [99]. Mussel's "angularity" has been proposed anyway to improve morphometric identification with discriminating thresholds for zebra and quagga mussels [100].…”
Section: The Usefulness Of Another Dreissenid Species D Rostriformimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mussel's "angularity" has been proposed anyway to improve morphometric identification with discriminating thresholds for zebra and quagga mussels [100]. Molecular genetic markers have then been developed to differentiate Dreissena species [97,98,101], but most of them are based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of cytochrome-C oxidase subunit I (COI gene). Such mitochondrial genetic tool does not allow identifying potential interspecific hybrids [97].…”
Section: The Usefulness Of Another Dreissenid Species D Rostriformimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations