2016
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural inactivation of Escherichia coli in anaerobic and reduced groundwater

Abstract: Aquifer recharge zones with geochemical characteristics observed in this study complement above-ground engineered processes (e.g. filtration, disinfection), while increasing the overall indicator micro-organism log-reduction rate of a facility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of compliance with the total coliform criterion was the most significant operational issue identified during KRASR testing. Recent work by Lisle (2016) demonstrates inactivation of Escherichia coli under sulfate‐reducing conditions of the UFA and APPZ occurs after a few weeks of storage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of compliance with the total coliform criterion was the most significant operational issue identified during KRASR testing. Recent work by Lisle (2016) demonstrates inactivation of Escherichia coli under sulfate‐reducing conditions of the UFA and APPZ occurs after a few weeks of storage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study on the inactivation of E. coli (i.e. loss of culturability) in diffusion chambers during exposure to groundwater in the UFA and Avon Park Permeable Zone (APPZ) of the Floridan Aquifer, demonstrated the geochemical conditions in both aquifer zones produced inactivation rates 21-fold greater than those derived from studies using oxygenated groundwater with positive redox potentials and no detectable sulphides (Lisle, 2016). These enhanced inactivation rates were proposed to be induced by exposure to the anaerobic and reduced groundwater, which resulted in levels of physiological stress and/or injury from which the E. coli cells could not recover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cryptosporidium sp., Giardia sp.) have been shown to be inactivated during exposure to native groundwater in aquifer storage zones at MAR facilities (Page et al, 2010(Page et al, , 2015Sidhu et al, 2010;Toze et al, 2010), including E. coli in the Floridan Aquifer (Lisle, 2016). When considering the risk to human health from consumption or exposure to water recovered from storage zones at ASR facilities in Florida, it is important to understand if microorganisms of regulatory interest are inactivated during exposure to geochemical conditions during storage in the aquifer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli (E. coli), bacteriophages (e.g., MS2) and eukaryotic viruses (e.g., adenovirus, rotavirus) and encysted protozoans (e.g., Cryptosporidium sp., Giardia sp.) have been shown to be inactivated during the storage of recharged surface water in aquifer zones [10][11][12][13][14], including the Floridan Aquifer [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can inform policy regarding the value of pathogen inactivation during storage cycles at ASR facilities in the context of meeting regulatory standards and the critical need to incorporate environmental conditions into treatment trains, regulatory criteria and decision making. This study utilizes previously published pathogen inactivation rates from studies in the Upper Floridan (UF) and Avon Park Permeable Zone (APPZ) zones within the Floridan Aquifer System located in centralto-south Florida [15,16] to inform pathogen inactivation and human health risks over time in the respective ASR storage zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%