2014
DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2014.2315271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Language Generation as Incremental Planning Under Uncertainty: Adaptive Information Presentation for Statistical Dialogue Systems

Abstract: We present and evaluate a novel approach to natural language generation (NLG) in statistical spoken dialogue systems (SDS) using a data-driven statistical optimization framework for incremental information presentation (IP), where there is a trade-off to be solved between presenting "enough" information to the user while keeping the utterances short and understandable. The trained IP model is adaptive to variation from the current generation context (e.g. a user and a non-deterministic sentence planner), and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of removing such information is called sentence aggregation (Dalianis, 1999). It is possible to find in the literature much more sophisticated and recent approaches than template-based, such as statistical (Dethlefs, Hastie, Cuayáhuitl, & Lemon, 2013;Rieser, Lemon, & Keizer, 2014).…”
Section: Natural Language Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of removing such information is called sentence aggregation (Dalianis, 1999). It is possible to find in the literature much more sophisticated and recent approaches than template-based, such as statistical (Dethlefs, Hastie, Cuayáhuitl, & Lemon, 2013;Rieser, Lemon, & Keizer, 2014).…”
Section: Natural Language Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has explored the problem of adapting the form and content of generated utterances to situational constraints (e.g. Jokinen and Wilcock, 2003;Walker et al, 2007;Rieser et al, 2014), but typically not in the context of human-robot interaction. In order to illustrate our position, we will describe some results and observations from our ongoing research on making human-robot communication more robust using non-verbal signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has explored the problem of adapting the form and content of generated utterances to situational constraints (e.g. Jokinen and Wilcock, 2003;Walker et al, 2007;Rieser et al, 2014), but typically not in the context of human-robot interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%