Natural Language Processing–Enabled and Conventional Data Capture Methods for Input to Electronic Health Records: A Comparative Usability Study

Abstract

BackgroundThe process of documentation in electronic health records (EHRs) is known to be time consuming, inefficient, and cumbersome. The use of dictation coupled with manual transcription has become an increasingly common practice. In recent years, natural language processing (NLP)–enabled data capture has become a viable alternative for data entry. It enables the clinician to maintain control of the process and potentially reduce the documentation burden. The question remains how this NLP-enabled workflow will impact EHR usability and whether it can meet the structured data and other EHR requirements while enhancing the user’s experience.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an NLP-enabled data capture method using dictation and data extraction from transcribed documents (NLP Entry) in terms of documentation time, documentation quality, and usability versus standard EHR keyboard-and-mouse data entry.MethodsThis formative study investigated the results of using 4 combinations of NLP Entry and Standard Entry methods (“protocols”) of EHR data capture. We compared a novel dictation-based protocol using MediSapien NLP (NLP-NLP) for structured data capture against a standard structured data capture protocol (Standard-Standard) as well as 2 novel hybrid protocols (NLP-Standard and Standard-NLP). The 31 participants included neurologists, cardiologists, and nephrologists. Participants generated 4 consultation or admission notes using 4 documentation protocols. We recorded the time on task, documentation quality (using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument, PDQI-9), and usability of the documentation processes.ResultsA total of 118 notes were documented across the 3 subject areas. The NLP-NLP protocol required a median of 5.2 minutes per cardiology note, 7.3 minutes per nephrology note, and 8.5 minutes per neurology note compared with 16.9, 20.7, and 21.2 minutes, respectively, using the Standard-Standard protocol and 13.8, 21.3, and 18.7 minutes using the Standard-NLP protocol (1 of 2 hybrid methods). Using 8 out of 9 characteristics measured by the PDQI-9 instrument, the NLP-NLP protocol received a median quality score sum of 24.5; the Standard-Standard protocol received a median sum of 29; and the Standard-NLP protocol received a median sum of 29.5. The mean total score of the usability measure was 36.7 when the participants used the NLP-NLP protocol compared with 30.3 when they used the Standard-Standard protocol.ConclusionsIn this study, the feasibility of an approach to EHR data capture involving the application of NLP to transcribed dictation was demonstrated. This novel dictation-based approach has the potential to reduce the time required for documentation and improve usability while maintaining documentation quality. Future research will evaluate the NLP-based EHR data capture approach in a clinical setting. It is reasonable to assert that EHRs will increasingly use NLP-enabled data entry tools such as MediSapien NLP because they hold promise for enhancing ...

Care-Centered Clinical Documentation in the Digital Environment: Solutions to Alleviate Burnout

“…Current use of NLP also allows clinicians to dictate a clinical experience and can provide structured data without the use of a template. In a study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, use of dictation plus NLP reduced documentation time while maintaining documentation quality [40]. Future tools that facilitate the presentation of summary insights from the past in a succinct fashion would save clinicians time and prevent important information from falling through the cracks.…”

Generating case notes from digital transcripts using text mining

“…Limited face-to-face time is especially disadvantageous for working with mental health patients where the psychiatrist could easily miss a non-verbal cue highly important for the correct diagnosis. Moreover, EHR's usability related problems lead to unstructured and incomplete case notes (Kaufman et al, 2016) which are difficult to search and access.…”

“…Nagy et al developed a voice controlled EHR system for dentists, called DentVoice, that enables dentists to control the EHR and take notes over voice and without taking off their gloves while working with their patients (Nagy et al, 2008). Kaufman et al also developed a NLP-enabled dictation-based data entry where clinicians can write case notes over voice and able to reduce the time spent on writing case notes by more than 60% (Kaufman et al, 2016).…”

“…To utilize the full potential of EHRs, clinicians should generate case notes in both human and machine readable formats (Kaufman et al, 2016). Incomplete and unstructured case notes are difficult to search and access.…”

Augmenting Qualitative Text Analysis with Natural Language Processing: Methodological Study (Preprint)

“…NLP is an area of research and application that explores how computers can be used to understand and manipulate natural language text or speech to accomplish useful tasks [3]. It allows for substantially larger text databases than typical qualitative analysis methods and has been applied to data from electronic health records [4,5], PubMed [6], social media data [7], and text messages [8]. However, research examining the methodological merits of NLP techniques is necessary to further consider NLP as a feasible and high quality approach.…”