“…The role of inhibition in mathematics tasks was the topic of a Special Issue of ZDM Mathematics Education (Van Dooren & Inglis, 2015). The studies in this Special Issue contrasted the participants' performance in tasks consisting of a consistent and an inconsistent condition and in which the inconsistent trials involved salient but irrelevant perceptual stimuli (e.g., comparing perimeters of geometric shapes as in Babai, Shalev, & Stavy, 2015), simple intuitions (e.g., longer length implies larger number, as in Lubin, Simon, Houde, & De Neys, 2015), or conceptual change learning, where the whole number bias had to be overcome (e.g., Christou, 2015;McMullen, Hannula-Sormunen, & Lehtinen, 2015;Van Hoof, Janssen, Verschaffel, & Van Dooren, 2015). The results confirmed the hypothesis that the employment of mathematics concepts in the consistent condition was more accurate and faster than in the inconsistent condition, suggesting that the extra time is used to inhibit the interfering stimuli.…”