A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk Declaring that Deeker "is perfectly acquainted with the nature and construction of AIR BALLOONS," the broadside then went on to announce that: "As the novelty of an exhibition of this nature may afford some amusement to the Public, at the request of a number of respectable characters in this city, he proposes to open a SUBSCRIPTION for supplying the materials necessary for constructing and filling one of twenty-five feet diameter."1 Despite the anonymous author's faith in the generosity, and curiosity, of the American public, however, Deeker's visit to the new republic was not universally welcomed. In late July, for example, an exasperated citizen of Pennsylvania wrote a letter to the Freeman's Journal which addressed itself "To the Air-Balloon Maker." "Confound you and your ballooning -had you built such a thing and gone off in it to Nova-Scotia, Rhode Island, or to old nick, it would not signify sixpence to me," the author complained, "but you are so full of your 2 invention, that nothing less than the public papers must give information of your intended flight; by which you have set my whole house in confusion." 2 Although clearly shot through with comic hyperbole (the author goes on to describe how he lost his wife after she built her own balloon and disappeared into the heavens), this essay in the Freeman's Journal is nonetheless making a very serious point. Ballooning in late eighteenth century America was not only hugely popular and much discussed, it was also a source of persistent anxiety.Thus when an anonymous correspondent wrote to The Salem Gazette about an "aerostatick balloon" he had seen on display in Maryland it was with a mixture of optimism and trepidation. "I am pleased in reflecting how much our countrymen have done to improve the various branches of science, and doubt not our being as much The public interest in ballooning, as both these 3 writers suggest, had changed it into a form of spectacle, enlarging its remit from education to entertainment, and pushing it beyond the realm of scientific investigation into the hands of a rapidly commercializing, increasingly mercurial urban populace.Indeed, the "balloon Madness," as my epigraph from the American Herald calls it, was an historical episode in which one of the public's primary concerns was with its own capacity to be infatuated, dissatisfied and misled. The capacity of ballooning to glide through so many different discourses as "symbol, simile, and metaphor" (in the words of Richard P. Hallion), confirms that, as significant as it may or may not have been scientifically, ballooning had a larger importance as a catalyst for the more general apprehensions an...