2018
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural selection favors local specialization in a widespread habitat generalist

Abstract: The ecological success of widespread species is attributed to an ability to generalize across diverse habitats, a so-called "jack of all trades" scenario. However, this assumption ignores the potential for local specialization, an alternative scenario whereby spatial variation in natural selection generates habitat-specific fitness surfaces. Despite a growing recognition of spatial variation in selection in nature, and the inevitable exploitation of distinct habitat types across an extensive geographic range, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(169 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, highly plastic lines could also experience reduced fitness if they are too phenotypically labile or developmentally unstable (e.g., Relyea 2002;Tonsor et al 2013). Thus, we might expect that fitness would be maximized at intermediate trait plasticity (Scheiner and Holt 2012;Scheiner 2013), just as stabilizing selection can favor intermediate trait expression in multivariate trait space (Dudley 1996;Brooks et al 2005; e.g., Wadgymar et al 2017;Taylor et al 2018). Logistical constraints often preclude the sample sizes necessary to gain sufficient statistical power for these analyses and the duration of the field studies from which to estimate plasticity and fitness.…”
Section: Stabilizing Selection On Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, highly plastic lines could also experience reduced fitness if they are too phenotypically labile or developmentally unstable (e.g., Relyea 2002;Tonsor et al 2013). Thus, we might expect that fitness would be maximized at intermediate trait plasticity (Scheiner and Holt 2012;Scheiner 2013), just as stabilizing selection can favor intermediate trait expression in multivariate trait space (Dudley 1996;Brooks et al 2005; e.g., Wadgymar et al 2017;Taylor et al 2018). Logistical constraints often preclude the sample sizes necessary to gain sufficient statistical power for these analyses and the duration of the field studies from which to estimate plasticity and fitness.…”
Section: Stabilizing Selection On Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How organisms respond to changing environments is a guiding question of macroecology. Species with broad geographic or elevational distributions often exhibit population‐specific responses to local environmental conditions (Taylor, Ternes, & Lattanzio, ). Thus, detecting within‐ and among‐population variation in important traits is key for understanding if, and how, species can respond to temporal or spatial environmental shifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, individual bees have been found to prefer one or the other of two columbine species, Aquilegia formosa and A. pubescens (Fulton and Hodges 1999). Generalist species may fill their wide niche due to within-species variability under contrasting selection in different habitats, as shown for tree lizards by Taylor et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%