2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturalistic Stimuli in Neuroscience: Critically Acclaimed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
362
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
7
362
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings have implications for our interpretation of time-varying FC not just during passive moviewatching [35], but also during task-free conditions. Most importantly, we show that the fMRI BOLD response is capable of resolving meaningful fluctuations in timevarying FC (albeit only in the statistical sense).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings have implications for our interpretation of time-varying FC not just during passive moviewatching [35], but also during task-free conditions. Most importantly, we show that the fMRI BOLD response is capable of resolving meaningful fluctuations in timevarying FC (albeit only in the statistical sense).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recently, movie-watching paradigms have become popular within the neuroimaging [35][36][37][38] and network neuroscience communities [39][40][41][42], where FC estimated from movie-watching exhibits greater test-retest reliability [43], benefits from reduced in-scanner head motion [44,45], and enhances the identifiability of individual subjects [46] compared to rest. Additionally, movies feature correlated categories that better match the statistical properties of our day-to-day experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data acquisition during movie watching improves compliance in young children, thus reducing movement artifacts in the recordings. Also, it allows the recording of neural activity during the viewing of naturalistic stimuli Cantlon and Li (2013) and enhances brain-behavior correlations Vanderwal et al (2018) and test-retest reliability Sonkusare et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modifications allow participants to gather more information about the affective content of the faces, reducing ambiguity and increasing ecological validity of the stimuli and the ratings (e.g. the fact that in real life social interactions people have reasonably long time to observe others’ facial emotions, see Sonkusare, Breakspear and Guo (2019) for a critical appraisal of existing task designs in cognitive neuroscience 48 ). Therefore, in future studies, it would be very important to gather large-scale data to validate the affective content of the facial expressions used in the current study, which can help understanding how symptoms of depression and anxiety influence facial emotion recognition in the wider population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%