2012
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2011.579418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturalizing joint action: A process-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has turned out to be particularly useful, because, according to dynamical systems theory, in order to claim that two (or more) systems give rise to an overall extended (viz., coupled) system, what is required is the existence of non-linear relations that arise out of mutual interactions between the contributing parts (Chemero 2009, Froese et al 2013, Theiner et al 2010, Tollefsen & Dale 2011, Palermos 2014b. Accordingly, on the basis of dynamical systems theory, we can claim that in order to have an extended cognitive system, all we need is that the internal and external parts interact mutually with each other.…”
Section: Extended Cognition: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has turned out to be particularly useful, because, according to dynamical systems theory, in order to claim that two (or more) systems give rise to an overall extended (viz., coupled) system, what is required is the existence of non-linear relations that arise out of mutual interactions between the contributing parts (Chemero 2009, Froese et al 2013, Theiner et al 2010, Tollefsen & Dale 2011, Palermos 2014b. Accordingly, on the basis of dynamical systems theory, we can claim that in order to have an extended cognitive system, all we need is that the internal and external parts interact mutually with each other.…”
Section: Extended Cognition: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary studies by Paxton and Dale seem to confirm the prediction (Paxton & Dale, submitted for publication). Accordingly, we argue that the study of collective minds can and indeed should be articulated with the empirical findings from the study of joint action (Galantucci, 2009;Hasson et al, 2012;Obhi & Sebanz, 2011;Ramenzoni et al, 2012;Shockley et al, 2009;Tollefsen & Dale, 2012). Tollefsen and Dale (2012) have sketched how non-verbal alignment could be connected with joint agency.…”
Section: Dialogical Extended Minds: Discussion and Potential Critiquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transactive memory is functionally equivalent to biological memory and to the use of a notebook as memory support: the partners are mostly available and accessible to each other and they actively create, maintain and retrieve endorsed information in a way that makes them complementary (Peltokorpi, 2008;Sutton et al, 2011;Theiner et al, 2010). Along similar lines, Tollefsen and Dale discuss how low-level behavioural coordination creates in certain cases a feeling of joint agency between the individuals involved (Tollefsen & Dale, 2012).…”
Section: Language As a Tool For Interacting Mindsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is overlap between this theory and a theory according to which affordances are socially shaped by enactive processes that bring the behavioral and cognitive states of multiple people into alignment "directly" through interactive dynamics (Schmidt & Richardson, 2008;Walton, Richardson, & Chemero, 2014). But recent work on the mechanics of shared intentionality, as well as reflections on the importance of sharing mental states for the development of the mind, make it possible to acknowledge the role of interactive dynamics within a more traditional approach to the ontology of the (social) mind-in part by making room for research on more basic forms of alignment (Gallotti & Frith, 2013;Tollefsen & Dale, 2012).…”
Section: Extending Mentality Through Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%