2017
DOI: 10.1177/2156587217744914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturally Available Extracts Inhibiting Cancer Progression: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Aim.This systematic review is aimed at evaluating the literature on the efficacy of naturally available extracts that inhibit cancer.Methods.A literature search was performed to strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology analysis. Approximately 3000 research articles were initially selected. Of these articles, 200 were included, and 2800 were excluded. On further scrutiny, 150 of the 200 studies were reviews, seminars, and presentations, and 50 were original study articles. Among thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of low concentrations of all extracts (75 and 125 µg/mL) stimulated their metabolic activity, while, for the same concentration, the tumor cells had a decrease on their metabolic activity. Though the variability of results is high (which is common in these type of tests), this effect is statistically different and this result is in accordance with the literature, where it is described that naturally available extracts of different sources selectively inhibit abnormal cell proliferation without interrupting normally functioning cells [58]. Therefore, this finding is the ideal condition for a potential anti-cancer effect, as it would only affect the cancer cells and not the healthy cells.…”
Section: Cell Viabilitysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The presence of low concentrations of all extracts (75 and 125 µg/mL) stimulated their metabolic activity, while, for the same concentration, the tumor cells had a decrease on their metabolic activity. Though the variability of results is high (which is common in these type of tests), this effect is statistically different and this result is in accordance with the literature, where it is described that naturally available extracts of different sources selectively inhibit abnormal cell proliferation without interrupting normally functioning cells [58]. Therefore, this finding is the ideal condition for a potential anti-cancer effect, as it would only affect the cancer cells and not the healthy cells.…”
Section: Cell Viabilitysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Despite the remarkable progress in synthetic organic medicinal products of the twentieth century, over 25% of prescribed medicines in industrialized countries are derived directly or indirectly from plants 3 . The deduction from this study that the test plants used have potential to be used as anti-cancer agents because of their rich phytochemical contents is in tandem with the reports of so many researchers [15][16][17][18][19] . However, plants used in traditional medicine are still under investigation 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In this study, we evidenced that P2Et and Anamú-SC plant extracts are not toxic to microenvironment BM cells such as ECs and MSC, regardless of the culture system evaluated (2D vs. 3D), as we had previously shown for other cell populations, such as fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells [ 32 , 33 , 35 ]. In addition, plant extracts have been reported to exert their antitumor effect with lower doses than conventional chemotherapeutics [ 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%