2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.15.151779
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturally mutated spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 variants show differential levels of cell entry

Abstract: 1The causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, severe 2 acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is steadily mutating during continuous 3 transmission among humans. Such mutations can occur in the spike (S) protein that binds to the 4 angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor and is cleaved by transmembrane protease 5 serine 2 (TMPRSS2). However, whether S mutations affect SARS-CoV-2 infectivity remains 6 unknown. Here, we show that naturally occurring S mutations… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
74
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5D), this modi cation not only increases the exibility of the hinge but also it changes the direction which might contribute to the increase virulency of this mutant because of might alter the binding to ACE protein 13 . Previously, it was found that D614 formed a hydrogen bond with T859 and a salt bridge with K854 placed on the subunit two of the other protomer, thus the change of D by G might provide a exible space between the monomers and more conformational exibility as our MD simulations suggest which might lead to improved accessibility to ACE2, which are consistent with more cell entry of the virus that carries this mutation 8,34 . This motion perturbation is explained because D614 residue is located on a loop exposed side chain, has a negative charge, and that will be a loss on the variant G614, this causes loss of interactions with other molecules or residues.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5D), this modi cation not only increases the exibility of the hinge but also it changes the direction which might contribute to the increase virulency of this mutant because of might alter the binding to ACE protein 13 . Previously, it was found that D614 formed a hydrogen bond with T859 and a salt bridge with K854 placed on the subunit two of the other protomer, thus the change of D by G might provide a exible space between the monomers and more conformational exibility as our MD simulations suggest which might lead to improved accessibility to ACE2, which are consistent with more cell entry of the virus that carries this mutation 8,34 . This motion perturbation is explained because D614 residue is located on a loop exposed side chain, has a negative charge, and that will be a loss on the variant G614, this causes loss of interactions with other molecules or residues.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
“…D614G change is caused by an A/G nucleotide mutation at position 23,403 in the reference strain 32 , this variant is being associated with higher viral loads and enhances viral effectivity in patients 8,32,33 despite the higher viral loads, G614 is neutralizing similarly as D614 by polyclonal antibody 32 . To date, this variant becomes the dominant form displacing the WT, according to the levels of mutation in the world, presented on the nextstrain database (www.nextstrain.org).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, two N-linked glycan modi cations occur within the conserved Receptor Binding Domain or RBD of the S protein. The RBD mediates the binding of the S protein to ACE2 7,8 and while there have been a number of documented polymorphisms in the amino acid sequence of the RBD from clinical isolates around the world 9 , these two glycosylation sites are uniformly conserved. This suggested to us the possibility that glycosylation of the RBD is important for its binding to the cellular ACE2 receptor or as suggested earlier inhibits immune recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%