Naturally Occurring Deletions of Hunchback Binding Sites in the Even-Skipped Stripe 3+7 Enhancer

Abstract

Changes in regulatory DNA contribute to phenotypic differences within and between taxa. Comparative studies show that many transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) are conserved between species whereas functional studies reveal that some mutations segregating within species alter TFBS function. Consistently, in this analysis of 13 regulatory elements in Drosophila melanogaster populations, single base and insertion/deletion polymorphism are rare in characterized regulatory elements. Experimentally defined TFBS are nearly devoid of segregating mutations and, as has been shown before, are quite conserved. For instance 8 of 11 Hunchback binding sites in the stripe 3+7 enhancer of even-skipped are conserved between D. melanogaster and Drosophila virilis. Oddly, we found a 72 bp deletion that removes one of these binding sites (Hb8), segregating within D. melanogaster. Furthermore, a 45 bp deletion polymorphism in the spacer between the stripe 3+7 and stripe 2 enhancers, removes another predicted Hunchback site. These two deletions are separated by ∼250 bp, sit on distinct haplotypes, and segregate at appreciable frequency. The Hb8Δ is at 5 to 35% frequency in the new world, but also shows cosmopolitan distribution. There is depletion of sequence variation on the Hb8Δ-carrying haplotype. Quantitative genetic tests indicate that Hb8Δ affects developmental time, but not viability of offspring. The Eve expression pattern differs between inbred lines, but the stripe 3 and 7 boundaries seem unaffected by Hb8Δ. The data reveal segregating variation in regulatory elements, which may reflect evolutionary turnover of characterized TFBS due to drift or co-evolution.

Novel approach to quantitative spatial gene expression uncovers genetic stochasticity in the developingDrosophilaeye

“…In another study on orthodenticle, the authors found that the spatial and temporal pattern of 408 gene expression was conserved but the amount of gene product was not, though this work was not 409 strictly quantitative given that measurements were from in situ hybridization and reporter constructs 410 (Palsson et al 2014). This is in contrast to our results which showed significant differences in the …”

The developmental transcriptome of contrasting Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) morphs

“…We are interested in how predictable evolution is a the molecular level and if there certain principles influence the rewiring of developmental and regulatory systems during evolution 81 . One way to study this is to identify genetic and developmental effects affecting key traits in species or populations which exhibit parallel evolution.…”

“…Our broad interest is in how natural selection tweaks genetic regulatory systems, for instance via genetic changes in regulatory sequences or post transcriptional modifiers relating to adaptations. Genetic changes affecting gene expression can be raw material for adaptation, but could also rise in frequency due to reverberations in regulatory cascades 81 . Our specific aim was to cast light on the developmental and population genetics of the unique small benthic charr, typically found in cold springs and small pond habitats in Iceland, particularly those with lava substratum 36, 51 .…”

Comparative genomic analysis of upstream miRNA regulatory motifs in Caenorhabditis

“…In addition, disruption of m2 abolished this expression gain and further decreased GFP expression when paired with mutations in m3a and m3b. Interestingly, motif m3 is particularly T-rich in C. elegans compared with other species, and a T-rich (or A-rich) motif is a consensus of TF "hunchback" (Inouchi et al 2007;Palsson et al 2014). Roush and Slack (2009) identified three hunchback binding sites upstream of let-7, one of them corresponding to motif m3a, and provided strong support that HBL-1 binds these motifs to repress let-7 expression.…”