2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturally Occurring Off-Switches for CRISPR-Cas9

Abstract: Summary CRISPR-Cas9 technology would be enhanced by the ability to inhibit Cas9 function spatially, temporally, or conditionally. Previously, we discovered small proteins encoded by bacteriophages that inhibit the CRISPR-Cas systems of their host bacteria. These “anti-CRISPRs” were specific to type I CRISPR-Cas systems that do not employ the Cas9 protein. We posited that nature would also yield Cas9 inhibitors in response to the evolutionary arms race between bacteriophages and their hosts. Here, we report the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
429
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(109 reference statements)
10
429
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce unspecific genomic changes by the nickase, CRISPR-Cas9 inhibitory proteins could be expressed to inhibit the activity of Cas9 after genomic editing (35,36). The prophage-encoded inhibitor proteins AcrIIA2 and AcrIIA4, which allow phages to evade the bacterial host's CRISPR/Cas immune system, were found to inhibit Cas9-based targeting in their native host Listeria monocytogenes, as well as Cas9 of Streptococcus pyogenes in bacteria and human cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce unspecific genomic changes by the nickase, CRISPR-Cas9 inhibitory proteins could be expressed to inhibit the activity of Cas9 after genomic editing (35,36). The prophage-encoded inhibitor proteins AcrIIA2 and AcrIIA4, which allow phages to evade the bacterial host's CRISPR/Cas immune system, were found to inhibit Cas9-based targeting in their native host Listeria monocytogenes, as well as Cas9 of Streptococcus pyogenes in bacteria and human cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a), since the Aca proteins need not necessarily engage any specific CRISPR-Cas system components directly. An aca2 ortholog (with a small, novel ORF upstream of it) was indeed identified in a putative MGE in a strain of Brackiella oedipodis that harbored a Type II-C CRISPR- cas locus but no Type I system [30]. The adjacent candidate acr gene had an ortholog in a strain of Neisseria meningitidis that was adjacent to a distinct candidate aca gene ( aca3 ).…”
Section: Type II Anti-crisprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a, several candidate Type II-C anti-CRISPRs were compiled, three of which were in a species readily amenable to functional analysis. Tests of native CRISPR interference in N. meningitidis 8013 validated all three meningococcal candidates (AcrIIC1 Nme , AcrIIC2 Nme , and AcrIIC3 Nme ) as bona fide Type II-C anti-CRISPRs [30]. Intriguingly, the B. oedipodis candidate (AcrIIC1 Boe ) was also found to prevent interference by the native NmeCas9 (~47% identical to B. oedipidis Cas9), indicating cross-species inhibition and suggesting that some type II anti-CRISPRs could be broad-spectrum Cas9 inhibitors.…”
Section: Type II Anti-crisprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phages can evolve or acquire counter-systems to circumvent bacterial immunity [79]. For example, some phages have produced their own methyltransferases to defend against bacterial restriction-modification systems [80], whereas other phages encode for anti-CRISPR-Cas systems [79,81].…”
Section: Phage Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%