2020
DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00092-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturalness in nuclear effective field theories

Abstract: Nuclear effective field theories (EFTs) have been developed over the last quartercentury with considerable impact on the description of light and even medium-mass nuclei. At the core of any EFT is a systematic expansion of observables, which is usually obtained from a rule based on an assumption of naturalness. I discuss naturalness in the context of the relatively weak binding of nuclei, where discrete scale invariance plays a role in the emergence of complexity.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(181 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The origin of the failure of NDA is the nonperturbative character of the NN amplitude at leading order (LO). NDA results from the assumption of naturalness [17,18] applied to the perturbative series [19]. It is well known that nonperturbative renormalization can be significantly different, however [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The origin of the failure of NDA is the nonperturbative character of the NN amplitude at leading order (LO). NDA results from the assumption of naturalness [17,18] applied to the perturbative series [19]. It is well known that nonperturbative renormalization can be significantly different, however [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P 2 ,where V c is positive when Λ is large, which is different from other channels. The residual cutoff dependence is plotted in Figs 19. and 20 for 13 P 2 -13 F 2 and 33 P 2 -33 F 2 , respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For a review, see Ref. [23].) This is assured if the renormalized LECs scale as C n = O(1/M n+1 hi ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43,44] to promote a contact NNN interaction to LO also in χEFT. However, one would like to understand the promotion or demotion of interactions either on the basis of the RG coupled to naturalness [45] or another power-counting argument. In contrast to pionless EFT, the trinucleon system is RG invariant without NNN forces in χEFT up to NLO with either MWPC or SEP [34,35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates suffer from a number of caveats. For one, they rely on NDA, which is based on purely perturbative arguments and is known to fail in the nuclear context where LO interactions must be treated nonperturbatively [45]. For example, renormalization of LO one-pion exchange in the NN 1 S 0 channel requires an interaction with a = 2, m = 1, d = 0, and p = 0 [18,19], which by Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%