2017
DOI: 10.7186/bgsm63201703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature and demise of the Proto-South China Sea

Abstract: The term Proto-South

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(175 reference statements)
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minor, ~10° CCW rotation since the Early Miocene constrained in the APWP of Borneo (Figure ) may indeed have been driven by this collision. Our new constraints showing a Late Eocene rotation coincide with two regional phenomena: (1) the onset of rapid northward motion of Australia relative to Eurasia around 45–40 Ma (Whittaker et al, ) and (2) the Sarawak Orogeny (Hutchison, ) or Rajang unconformity (Hall & Breitfeld, ) on NW Borneo, which involved folding and thrusting of the Upper Cretaceous‐Upper Eocene turbidites of the Rajang Group (Figure ) on NW Borneo. The deformed Rajang Group is separated by a regional unconformity of around 40–37 Ma (see discussion in Hall, ) from the overlying Upper Eocene‐lowest Miocene Crocker Group showing timing of deformation (Van Hattum et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The minor, ~10° CCW rotation since the Early Miocene constrained in the APWP of Borneo (Figure ) may indeed have been driven by this collision. Our new constraints showing a Late Eocene rotation coincide with two regional phenomena: (1) the onset of rapid northward motion of Australia relative to Eurasia around 45–40 Ma (Whittaker et al, ) and (2) the Sarawak Orogeny (Hutchison, ) or Rajang unconformity (Hall & Breitfeld, ) on NW Borneo, which involved folding and thrusting of the Upper Cretaceous‐Upper Eocene turbidites of the Rajang Group (Figure ) on NW Borneo. The deformed Rajang Group is separated by a regional unconformity of around 40–37 Ma (see discussion in Hall, ) from the overlying Upper Eocene‐lowest Miocene Crocker Group showing timing of deformation (Van Hattum et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Later uplift of the Rajang Group sediments is explained by a plate reconfiguration around 45 Ma and re-initiation of subduction around SE Asia. The onset of subduction of the proto-South China Sea beneath NW Borneo at the Sabah-Cagayan Arc (Hall, 2013a;Hall and Breitfeld, 2017) might have been the major contributing factor to the uplift in Borneo.…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was originally introduced to describe the oceanic crusts that formerly occupied the region north of Borneo where the modern South China Sea is located and were then consumed by Middle Cenozoic subduction beneath Borneo (Hall, 2002;Holloway, 1982;Taylor & Hayes, 1983), but subsequently was also used for inferred oceanic crusts, now disappeared, of quite different ages, notably that interpreted to have been subducted during the Mesozoic (Hutchison, 1996;King, Hillis, Tingay, & Damit, 2010;Moss, 1998). Here, we follow the definition of the latest review by Hall and Breitfeld (2017) that the term Proto-South China Sea should be used only for the slab subducted beneath Borneo from Eocene to Early Miocene, while easier episodes of subduction in this region should be named differently and a proper term for the Cretaceous subducted oceanic crusts may be the Palaeo-Pacific Ocean. The western limit of the Proto-South China Sea subduction was the West Baram Line, and subducted slab can be tomographically imaged in the lower mantle (Hall & Spakman, 2015;Wu & Suppe, 2017;Zheng et al, 2016) although a relatively shallow mantle anomaly has also been proposed to correspond the slab (Tang & Zheng, 2013;Zahirovic et al, 2014).…”
Section: Birth and Demise Of The Proto-south China Seamentioning
confidence: 99%