Nature and landscape conservation in transition in central and south-eastern Europe

Abstract

The collapse of socialism in central and eastern Europe and the transition to market‐based democracies has had far‐reaching effects on many aspects of environmental policy and management. This paper discusses key issues for nature and landscape conservation in the light of this transition and the likely enlargement of the European Union to include former socialist states. Case studies from two contrasting models of former socialist polities – the Czech Republic and Slovenia – highlight the need to analyse the current transition in the light of specific historic trajectories. Nevertheless, despite clear differences between protected area systems and their management in the two countries, clear commonalities relating to post‐socialist transition emerge – notably in relation to issues surrounding land ownership, new structures of state power, and developments in civil society. These issues are then discussed in relation to further likely transitions as the two countries seek to join the European Union. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment

Cross-cultural values and management preferences in protected areas of Norway and Poland

“…All national parks are included in Natura 2000 which results in the practical overlap of those two forms of protected areas (Radecki, 2006). Nature conservation governance in Poland has significantly evolved over time from a hierarchical, centralized, and expert-based system in the communist era (Tickle & Clarke, 2000) when local land management was practically ignored (Lawrence, 2008), to a less top-down approach today.…”

Local landscape designations in Scotland: Opportunity or barrier to effective landscape management?

“…Internationally protected landscapes have become firmly established as legitimate policy instruments as reflected in the World Heritage Convention (1972) and the European Landscape Convention (2000) (Jensen, 2006;Hamin, 2002;Phillips and Clarke, 2004). Their operation, through de jure or de facto protection from development or other activities likely to damage their natural, landscape or cultural character, varies according to the category of protection, the efficacy of institutional responses and their local acceptability (Fall, 2003;Rodrigues et al, 2004;Tickle and Clark, 2000;Selman, 2004). In particular policy imperatives now require participatory approaches involving stakeholders and the general public as core components of planning and management (Scott, 2003;Selman, 2004).…”

Agri-environmental policy systems in transition and preparation for EU membership

“…In contrast, the planning and decision making on landscape and nature protection in the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was transferred to the constituent republics, each of which had considerable political autonomy. This model of regional self-management strongly distinguished Yugoslavia from the Soviet dominated socialist states (Tickle and Clark, 2000). The Slovenian case discusses how coordinated environmental policy was introduced prior to 1989, but even here there have been implementation difficulties.…”