2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature-based forest management—Where are we going?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The production potential of forests in Europe and worldwide is limited [10,11]. New ecologically friendly approaches toward forest management, associated with the global climate change and negative impacts on forests will cause a change in the volume and quality of forest stands [12][13][14]. Moreover, green economics highlights more and more the non-production forest functions and the advantages of wood products from the point of view of carbon footprint [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production potential of forests in Europe and worldwide is limited [10,11]. New ecologically friendly approaches toward forest management, associated with the global climate change and negative impacts on forests will cause a change in the volume and quality of forest stands [12][13][14]. Moreover, green economics highlights more and more the non-production forest functions and the advantages of wood products from the point of view of carbon footprint [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, experiences from forestry, including nature-based forestry, and conservation management indicate that classification of woody species composition according to the relationship of key species to decisive environmental characteristics can inform the development of long-term management goals and approaches (Knight et al 2006; Larsen and Nielsen 2007; Cáceres and Legendre 2009). However, studies on plant regrowth after initial clearing of forest edges and its classification are rare, and tend to focus on single crop trees in strip shelterwood systems as a forestry practice in central Europe, where stands are regenerated successively in time and space (e.g., Wagner 1912; Henriksen 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the square matrix containing distances between pairs of plots, an initial partition was generated by cutting the dendrogram produced by Ward's hierarchical clustering (Ward 1963). Then, we used the clustering algorithm Partitioning Around Medoids (Kaufman and Rousseuw 1990) to refine this initial partition. A cluster medoid is defined as the object (i.e., a plot) having the minimal sum of distances to all the other objects in the cluster.…”
Section: Level 2-forest Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cluster medoid is defined as the object (i.e., a plot) having the minimal sum of distances to all the other objects in the cluster. We evaluated the final partitions corresponding to different numbers of clusters using Silhouette analysis (Kaufman and Rousseuw 1990). For each forest type, we selected the partition with the maximum number of clusters (subtypes) as long as the average cluster Silhouette was larger than 0.20 and all clusters had at least 10 plots assigned to them.…”
Section: Level 2-forest Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%