2021
DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2021.1998390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature-based interventions for vulnerable youth: a scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, low participation rate, differences in participant characteristics, a broad spectrum of program characteristics, and several methodological limitations characterizing the studies presented in this review prevent detailed recommendations for clinical practice. A broad spectrum of program characteristics has previously been described within the field of adventure therapy [11], and another scoping review on nature-based interventions for vulnerable youth has confirmed the lack of studies using a methodologically robust empirical design to increase external validity [45]. Thus, future studies targeting more specific groups, including true comparison groups, and using methodological sound instruments for data collection and analyses are warranted.…”
Section: Gaps In Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, low participation rate, differences in participant characteristics, a broad spectrum of program characteristics, and several methodological limitations characterizing the studies presented in this review prevent detailed recommendations for clinical practice. A broad spectrum of program characteristics has previously been described within the field of adventure therapy [11], and another scoping review on nature-based interventions for vulnerable youth has confirmed the lack of studies using a methodologically robust empirical design to increase external validity [45]. Thus, future studies targeting more specific groups, including true comparison groups, and using methodological sound instruments for data collection and analyses are warranted.…”
Section: Gaps In Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Future research can invest in culturally specific and community driven and engaged research that highlights community members’ capacity to ignite collective change. Nature-based healing and experiential outdoor programming are particularly promising avenues for such programming and may build off extant research centering these components (See for example: Carter et al, 2007 ; Linke, 2015 ; Overbey & Diekmann, 2021 ).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Evidence of improved health-related outcomes following interacting with nature has been demonstrated in different populations. 14,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43] However, to our knowledge, no systematic review of NBIs has been conducted that explicitly focused on children with ASD. Based on the available literature, NBIs have the potential to address health and functional outcome gaps among children with ASD, particularly regarding subjective well-being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NBIs for children with ASD in the existing literature are typically classified either as animal-assisted interventions or categorized under the other category . Evidence of improved health-related outcomes following interacting with nature has been demonstrated in different populations . However, to our knowledge, no systematic review of NBIs has been conducted that explicitly focused on children with ASD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%