Nature of Molecular Interactions of Peptides with Gold, Palladium, and Pd−Au Bimetal Surfaces in Aqueous Solution

Abstract

We investigated molecular interactions involved in the selective binding of several short peptides derived from phage-display techniques (8−12 amino acids, excluding Cys) to surfaces of Au, Pd, and Pd−Au bimetal. The quantitative analysis of changes in energy and conformation upon adsorption on even {111} and {100} surfaces was carried out by molecular dynamics simulation using an efficient computational screening technique, including 1000 explicit water molecules and physically meaningful peptide concentrations at pH = 7. Changes in chain conformation from the solution to the adsorbed state over the course of multiple nanoseconds suggest that the peptides preferably interact with vacant sites of the face-centered cubic lattice above the metal surface. Residues that contribute to binding are in direct contact with the metal surfaces, and less-binding residues are separated from the surface by one or two water layers. The strength of adsorption ranges from 0 to −100 kcal/(mol peptide) and scales with the surface energy of the metal (Pd surfaces are more attractive than Au surfaces), the affinity of individual residues versus the affinity of water, and conformation aspects, as well as polarization and charge transfer at the metal interface (only qualitatively considered here). A hexagonal spacing of ∼1.6 Å between available lattice sites on the {111} surfaces accounts for the characteristic adsorption of aromatic side groups and various other residues (including Tyr, Phe, Asp, His, Arg, Asn, Ser), and a quadratic spacing of ∼2.8 Å between available lattice sites on the {100} surface accounts for a significantly lower affinity to all peptides in favor of mobile water molecules. The combination of these factors suggests a “soft epitaxy” mechanism of binding. On a bimetallic Pd−Au {111} surface, binding patterns are similar, and the polarity of the bimetal junction can modify the binding energy by ∼10 kcal/mol. The results are semiquantitatively supported by experimental measurements of the affinity of peptides and small molecules to metal surfaces as well as results from quantum-mechanical calculations on small peptide and surface fragments. Interfaces were modeled using the consistent valence force field extended for Lennard-Jones parameters for fcc metals which accurately reproduce surface and interface energies [Heinz, H.; Vaia, R. A.; Farmer, B. L.; Naik, R. R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 17281−17290].

What makes a good graphene-binding peptide? Adsorption of amino acids and peptides at aqueous graphene interfaces

“…This local minimum is related to the 'solvent mediated' adsorption of the AAs, where the AA is separated from the graphene interface by the first layer of interfacial water molecules. This 'solvent mediated' minimum has also been observed for the adsorption of AAs and peptides at metal interfaces, 18,78,79 particularly for silver, 18,80 and mineral 26,30 interfaces.…”

Force Field and a Surface Model Database for Silica to Simulate Interfacial Properties in Atomic Resolution

“…Similar diversity of surface environments is also expected for other oxides such as titania and apatites, however, not for precious metals that are of simple chemistry and attract similar peptide sequences. [77][78][79][80][81][82][83] Two major factors play a role for the construction of a silica surface model. One is the type of substrate that determines the area density of silanol groups; the other is the degree of ionization ( as a function of pH and ionic strength.…”

Facet-Specific Adsorption of Tripeptides at Aqueous Au Interfaces: Open Questions in Reconciling Experiment and Simulation

“…Previous simulation studies have indicated that the adsorption of molecules at different facets can differ. 29,31,37,38,41 For example, the aforementioned study of Wright et al…”