Nature or nurture: why do railroads carry greater freight share in the United States than in Europe?

Abstract

During the 1950s, the share of freight carried by railroads was similar and declining in both the United States and Europe. By 2000, the railroads’ share of freight (measured in ton–kilometers) had reached 38% in the United States while falling to 8% in Europe. This paper examines the reasons for the difference in rail’s share of freight in Europe and the United States. We find that almost 83% of the gap in 2000 is probably due to natural or inherent differences, principally geography, shipment distance, and commodity mix. However, 17% of the gap cannot be explained by these inherent differences and is presumably due to public policies including priority of passenger service, lack of interoperability at borders, service quality and rates, and incentives of the rail operators. We estimate that if that policy gap were closed, railroads’ share of freight in Europe would increase from 8% to 13%. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007Railroad, Freight transportation, Europe, United States, Competition,

Transport Planning and Global Warming

“…Freight transport by rail will constitute almost 10% of total freight transport in 2020 (twice the proportion in 1990). This scenario is consistent with the EU's policy measures designed to promote cleaner modes of transport, as in almost all European countries, the railway sector is losing modal share (Vassallo & Fagan, 2007;Janic, 2007). The energy intensity of the railway decreases by up to 20% in this scenario, due to the introduction of new technologies for electric propulsion, which is included in the context of the new railway regulation (Izquierdo & Vassallo, 2004).…”

Changes in the external costs of freight surface transport In Spain

“…Since 1980, the US has invested in intermodal terminals, has improved line haul rail corridors and has developed more advanced designs for doublestack container trains, thus leading to growth that has outpaced that of the truck on a percentage basis. The experience of the US rail model runs counter to the experience of most European countries (Vassallo & Fagan, 2007).…”

Integrated Spatial and Transport Infrastructure Development

“…Experiences from overseas also stress the positive effect of liberalisation, which can also be observed in the United States of America, where the rail share of ton-km grew considerably from almost 30 % in 1980 to 38 % in the year 2000 following deregulation (Vassallo and Fagan 2007).…”