Maritime History and Identity 2014
DOI: 10.5040/9780755623730.ch-013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navalism and Greater Britain, 1897–1914

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Indeed, John C. Mitcham has argued that through the deployment of naval theatre the Royal Navy espoused a concept of a 'Sea Empire'; allowing the far sinews of the Empire to unite under a unified identity, which could breed loyalty to the British metropole. 20 However, this notion often excluded the participation of non-White citizens of Empire. Although army regiments of Sikhs and Ghurkhas were co-opted into Imperial Britain's military tapestry through the concept of 'martial races', such extensions were not afforded in a maritime capacity.…”
Section: Naval Theatre and The Portmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 Indeed, John C. Mitcham has argued that through the deployment of naval theatre the Royal Navy espoused a concept of a 'Sea Empire'; allowing the far sinews of the Empire to unite under a unified identity, which could breed loyalty to the British metropole. 20 However, this notion often excluded the participation of non-White citizens of Empire. Although army regiments of Sikhs and Ghurkhas were co-opted into Imperial Britain's military tapestry through the concept of 'martial races', such extensions were not afforded in a maritime capacity.…”
Section: Naval Theatre and The Portmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Certainly, the acceptance of a 'gifted' ship from the Federated States of Malaya in 1912, subsequently named HMS Malaya, garnered less attention from the British press than White Dominion 'gift' ships, such as HMS Australia and HMS New Zealand. 22 The acceptance into the fold of an Asian ally with power in the Pacific, which was also independent of British rule, was thus a departure from the narrative of Britain's Sea Empire. The incorporation of the IJN into Britain's Sea Empire therefore had to be carefully choreographed.…”
Section: Naval Theatre and The Portmentioning
confidence: 99%