1989
DOI: 10.2514/3.23203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navier-Stokes analysis of solid propellant rocket motor internal flows

Abstract: A multidimensional implicit Navier-Stokes analysis that uses numerical solution of the ensemble-averaged Navier-Stokes equations in a nonorthogonal, body-fitted, cylindrical coordinate system has been applied to the simulation of the steady mean flow in solid propellant rocket motor chambers. The internal flow in a solid rocket motor chamber is injection driven, i.e., all of the gas in the domain enters via injection at the walls. The calculation procedure incorporates a two-equation (A>e) turbulence model and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beddini [17] employed a full Reynolds stress turbulence model to analyze the flows in porous channels. Sabnis et al [18] applied a low Reynolds number k-" model to predict the flowfield measured by Dunlap et al [10]. However, Liou and Lien [19] later noted that most of the previous numerical studies with existing turbulence models greatly overpredict turbulence levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Beddini [17] employed a full Reynolds stress turbulence model to analyze the flows in porous channels. Sabnis et al [18] applied a low Reynolds number k-" model to predict the flowfield measured by Dunlap et al [10]. However, Liou and Lien [19] later noted that most of the previous numerical studies with existing turbulence models greatly overpredict turbulence levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most of the earlier numerical works [6][7][8] employed the Reynolds stress or k-ε models to solve the turbulent flow. Their success was somewhat limited due to the restricted capability of the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stoke (RANS) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be owed to its association with several studies involving hydrodynamic instability [23][24][25][26][27][28], acoustic instability [29][30][31][32][33][34][35], wave propagation [36][37][38][39], particle-mean flow interactions [40], and rocket performance measurements [41][42][43]. The Taylor-Culick solution was originally verified to be an adequate representation of the expected flowfield in SRMs both numerically by Sabnis et al [44] and experimentally by Dunlap et al [45,46], thereby confirming its character in a nonreactive chamber environment. It was extended by Majdalani and Akiki [4] to include effects of viscosity and headwall injection, by Saad et al [42] and Sams et al [43] to account for wall taper, by Kurdyumov [47] to capture effects of irregular cross sections, and by Majdalani and Saad [48] to allow for arbitrary headwall injection.…”
Section: Doi: 102514/1j055949mentioning
confidence: 99%