1991
DOI: 10.1115/1.2909506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navier-Stokes Calculations of Transonic Flows Past Cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kubotskii and Tarn 38 Ashcroft et al 39 Moon et al 3 Shieh and Morris 61 Slirnon 4 Jacob et al 25 Shieh and Morris 5 Shieh and Morris 40 Colonius et al 53 Dougherty et al 42 Fuglsang and Cain 43 Srinivasan 63 Venkatapathy et al 47 Srinivasan and Bay sal 15 Atwood 41 Tu 76 Suhs 50 Shih et al 79 Kirn and Chokani 68 Zharig 48 Baysal and Stallings 72 Stanek et al 77 Rizzetta 49 Arunajatesan et al 52 Tarn et al 51 ' 75 Sinha et al 44 Gorski et al 45 Baysal 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 3D 2D 3D 2D,3D 3D 3D 2D 2D 2D 2D 3D 3D 3D 2D 3D 3D 2D 3D Same…”
Section: Key For Thementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kubotskii and Tarn 38 Ashcroft et al 39 Moon et al 3 Shieh and Morris 61 Slirnon 4 Jacob et al 25 Shieh and Morris 5 Shieh and Morris 40 Colonius et al 53 Dougherty et al 42 Fuglsang and Cain 43 Srinivasan 63 Venkatapathy et al 47 Srinivasan and Bay sal 15 Atwood 41 Tu 76 Suhs 50 Shih et al 79 Kirn and Chokani 68 Zharig 48 Baysal and Stallings 72 Stanek et al 77 Rizzetta 49 Arunajatesan et al 52 Tarn et al 51 ' 75 Sinha et al 44 Gorski et al 45 Baysal 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 2D 3D 2D 3D 2D,3D 3D 3D 2D 2D 2D 2D 3D 3D 3D 2D 3D 3D 2D 3D Same…”
Section: Key For Thementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the literature though, one can find vastly different values reported. 15 Recently, Tracy and Plentovich 16 and Raman et al 17 have concluded that the disagreement found in the literature stems from the dependence of the cavity flow type on Mach number For open cavities and cavities operating in the shearlayer mode, empirical formulae exist for predicting the frequency of oscillation. For deeper cavities, the natural frequency of the cavity, i.e., acoustic depth modes, are observed.…”
Section: Characterization Of Cavity Flowmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Early studies of cavity flows using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) focused on the use of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations in conjunction with various turbulence closures. Most applications of unsteady RANS (URANS) to cavity flows have employed algebraic turbulence models, especially different versions of the Baldwin-Lomax models [31], due to their simplicity [32,33]. However, such simple eddy viscosity models are not able to predict the turbulent cavity-flow field [34], and investigations with more advanced turbulence models such as the two-equation k-" and k-!…”
Section: A Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The flow field features boundary layer separation, shear layer instability, vortex flow, acoustics radiation, shock/expansion wave and shock-boundarylayer interactions, and self-sustained pressure oscillations. The co-presence of and interaction among these features in such a simple configuration and their potential hazardous effects on the performance, integrity, and stability of the vehicles present a challenging problem and have stimulated extensive experimental, analytical, 8,9,24,[37][38][39][40] and computational [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] investigations over the years. These studies largely concentrated on mean static-pressure distributions and/or unsteady-pressure spectra in cavities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%