2017
DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating a world of religious NGOs: Ethnography, abstraction, and views of the horizon

Abstract: Since the turn of the twenty‐first century, there has been a prodigious production of typological studies seeking to “map” religious NGOs. In this paper, our intention is not to construct yet another new map of religious NGOs, or even to map these earlier mappings. Rather we would like to open up here some new conversations about the ways in which we might better understand, appreciate, and build upon work that has been done to date on NGOs at the intersection of religion and development. In doing this, we exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 For valuable overviews of this literature, see: Jones and Juul Petersen (2011), Fountain (2013), Fountain and Feener (2017), and Fountain and Juul Petersen (2018).…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For valuable overviews of this literature, see: Jones and Juul Petersen (2011), Fountain (2013), Fountain and Feener (2017), and Fountain and Juul Petersen (2018).…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as considering Forman's taxonomy as applied to Talua, it is also worth considering it in relation to genesis and motivation. Fountain and Feener (2017) have noted the widespread use of taxonomies in mapping development, including in the religious domain. They argue that taxonomies are maps.…”
Section: Forman's Taxonomy and The Realities Of Vanuatumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Then President to disregard aid recipients' historically and culturally situated understandings-resulting in the reinforcement of top-down, ethnocentric formulations and problematic distinctions between over-determined imaginations of the spheres of 'religion' and 'development'. 5 ethnographies of FBOs, on the other hand, often question the cross-cultural validity of such a sharp distinction between religion and development and reveal the contingent character of this constructed dichotomy as grounded in specific histories of Western modernity (e.g., Benthall and Bellion-Jourdan, 2009;Bolotta, 2017;Bornstein, 2005;Fauzia, 2013;Feener, 2013;Feener and Keping, forthcoming;Fountain et al, 2015;Mostowlansky, 2017;Scheer et al, 2018). 6 Such studies have examined how the religioussecular divide gets divergently signified and contested at global, national and local levels by a range of different actors, such as international and private donors, policymakers, political authorities, NGO workers, religious specialists and aid recipients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%