Navigating complexity of child abuse through intuition and evidence-based guidelines: a mix-methods study among child and youth healthcare practitioners

Abstract

Background: Dutch child and youth health care (CYHC) practitioners monitor and assess the well-being of children. One of their main concerns is identifying cases of child abuse, which is an arduous and sensitive task. In these contexts, CYHC-practitioners use both evidence-based guidelines aimed at increasing the quality of care through rationalised decision-making, and intuition. These two practices are seen as being at odds with each other, yet empirical research has shown that both are necessary in healthcare. This study aims to unravel how intuition is perceived and used by Dutch CYHC-practitioners when identifying and working with cases of child abuse, and how this relates to their evidence-based guidelines. Methods: A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design: in-depth semi-structured interviews with CYHCphysicians focused on perceptions on intuition, which were followed by a survey amongst CYHC-practitioners on the recognition and use of the concept. Results: The majority of CYHC-practitioners recognise and use intuition in their daily work, stating that it is necessary in their profession. CYHC-practitioners use intuition to 1) sense that something is 'off', 2) differentiate between 'normal' and 'abnormal', 3) assess risks, 4) weigh secondary information and 5) communicate with parents. At the same time, they warn of its dangers, as it may lead to 'tunnel vision' and false accusations. Conclusion: Intuition is experienced as an integral part of the work of CYHC-practitioners. It is understood as particularly useful in cases of child abuse, which are inherently complex, as signs and evidence of abuse are often hidden, subtle and unique in each case. CYHC-practitioners use intuition to manage and navigate this complexity. There is an opportunity for guidelines to support reflection and intuition as a 'good care' practice.

A qualitative study of public health nurses' experiences detecting and preventing child maltreatment in primary care settings

“…They would try to gather more information when they sensed ‘something was off’ or had a ‘gut feeling’. This is consistent with a recent study of healthcare providers in primary care in the Netherlands (Erisman et al, 2020). Erisman et al (2020) describe how Dutch health professionals used their intuition (i.e.…”

Child abuse knowledge and attitudes among dental and oral health therapists in Aotearoa New Zealand: a cross-sectional study

“…A CAN identification process is highly reliant on health practitioners’ personal judgment and a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities [ 37 ]. This emphasises the need to improve oral health practitioners’ understanding in detecting CAN cases in early stages, provide the necessary support to children and their families, and report to the child protection agencies to provide safer environments to children and adolescents in need.…”

“…Given the complexity of family violence, it is unlikely that a single guideline will suffice [ 37 ]. Even so, having practical guidance from the regulatory authority can increase oral health practitioners’ confidence to take action.…”

Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study

“…To make sense of how, when, and why suspicions of maltreatment arise in general practice, studies have applied theoretical concepts such as intuition [ 21 ] and gut feeling [ 15 , 22 ]. We explore this through the concept of uncertainty which is increasingly recognised as a condition for practicing medicine [ 23 ] and is intrinsic to making choices (on treatment, procedures, medication etc.).…”