2022
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.949280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating ethical challenges in the development and translation of biomaterials research

Abstract: Biomaterials--from implanted iron teeth in the second century to intraocular lenses, artificial joints, and stents today--have long been used clinically. Today, biomaterials researchers and biomedical engineers are pushing beyond these inert synthetic alternatives and incorporating complex multifunctional materials to control biological interactions and direct physiological processes. These advances are leading to novel strategies for targeted drug delivery, drug screening, diagnostics and imaging, gene therap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several studies have already described and standardized the decellularization for muscle tissue, most of them used samples from small lab animals such as rats, mice, and rabbits, which, considering translational science, have limited application [18]. Ideally, scaffolds derived from human muscle tissue would be the best option to use in clinical practice due to allogenic compatibility; however, this scenario is not realistic, as human sample acquisition is restricted by several bioethical drawbacks, becoming an enviable source for large-scale purposes [38]. In addition, studies have already attested that xenogeneic acellular matrices, when implanted in vivo when well produced, generate little or no immunological response in the host, overcoming immune limitations for their application [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have already described and standardized the decellularization for muscle tissue, most of them used samples from small lab animals such as rats, mice, and rabbits, which, considering translational science, have limited application [18]. Ideally, scaffolds derived from human muscle tissue would be the best option to use in clinical practice due to allogenic compatibility; however, this scenario is not realistic, as human sample acquisition is restricted by several bioethical drawbacks, becoming an enviable source for large-scale purposes [38]. In addition, studies have already attested that xenogeneic acellular matrices, when implanted in vivo when well produced, generate little or no immunological response in the host, overcoming immune limitations for their application [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, this approach to tissue regeneration is referred as in situ tissue engineering (Abdulghani & Mitchell, 2019 ; Bouten et al, 2018 ). This differs from ‘conventional’ tissue engineering approaches that rely largely on the presence of (stem) cells on the implant construct prior to implantation (Hoerstrup et al, 2006 ). In addition to heart valve regeneration, in situ tissue engineering is also being explored for regeneration of vessels (Li et al, 2014 ), bone (Cao et al, 2020 ; Vermeulen et al, 2022 ; Wei et al, 2022 ), and cartilage in joints (Wang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that, for risk assessment, only a limited number of in vitro tests have been validated, primarily for individual chemical substances but not for biomaterials or medical devices [ 3 ]. This standard also introduced new guidelines aimed at enhancing in vivo biocompatibility assessment, thereby promoting a reduction in the burden on animals and economic resources [ 4 ]. Tissue engineering (TE) represents an interdisciplinary field of biomedicine that owes its rapid advancement primarily to scientific progress in developmental biology and biomaterial sciences [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%