2023
DOI: 10.1086/723064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating Tensions in School Discipline: Examining School Leaders, Teachers, and the Conversion of Referrals into Suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…School leaders also identified Black students who were labeled as persistent “troublemakers” as an explanation for racial inequity in school discipline– the belief being that overall disparities are the result of one or two Black students who are repeatedly suspended, shifting responsibility away from the system or school itself and onto students who exhibit behaviors that disrupt the learning environment. This is congruent with recent findings about school leaders’ notions about student misbehavior in schools concentrated on a few repeat offenders (EAB, 2019; Welsh, 2022b; Welsh, 2023). For instance, a survey of district administrators, school administrators, teachers, and support specialists highligthed that “district and school administrators tend to believe the issue is confined to a small percentage of students who have significant behavioral issues and are repeat offenders” whereas “teachers, on the other hand, estimate that nearly one-quarter of their students exhibit disruptive behavior” (p.5; EAB, 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…School leaders also identified Black students who were labeled as persistent “troublemakers” as an explanation for racial inequity in school discipline– the belief being that overall disparities are the result of one or two Black students who are repeatedly suspended, shifting responsibility away from the system or school itself and onto students who exhibit behaviors that disrupt the learning environment. This is congruent with recent findings about school leaders’ notions about student misbehavior in schools concentrated on a few repeat offenders (EAB, 2019; Welsh, 2022b; Welsh, 2023). For instance, a survey of district administrators, school administrators, teachers, and support specialists highligthed that “district and school administrators tend to believe the issue is confined to a small percentage of students who have significant behavioral issues and are repeat offenders” whereas “teachers, on the other hand, estimate that nearly one-quarter of their students exhibit disruptive behavior” (p.5; EAB, 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Studies find that educators often use colorblind, neoliberal logic to explain racial disparities in school discipline, believing Black students’ character, ability, or inherent deficiencies are the root cause of inequity—reinforcing the idea that Black students are not mistreated but deserving of harsher treatment (Gregory & Mosely, 2004; Sondel et al, 2019; Tefera et al, 2022; Welsh, 2023a). This shift in blame may result in policies and practices that locate the crisis of educational inequities within Black students and families themselves, evading responsibility for deep structural changes and instead developing solutions that wrongfully attempt to force assimilation and adaptation among Black students through punishment and exclusion.…”
Section: Antiblackness In School Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the Antiblackness in School Discipline framework compels researchers to shift the gaze from students to adults in schools in understanding school discipline. Much of the attention/emphasis placed on contributors to racial inequality in school discipline and the focus/target of school discipline reforms has been student-focused (Cruz et al, 2021; Welsh, 2023a; Welsh & Little, 2018a). The framework underlines the importance of approaching research inquiries in school discipline from an asset-based perspective (Castillo & Gillborn, 2022; Welsh et al, 2023).…”
Section: Antiblackness In School Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discipline protocols are enacted inconsistently within and between schools (Griffith & Tyner, 2019). Variability in school leaders’ philosophies around school discipline and their relationships with teachers in addressing discipline incidents influence the severity of their responses (Sorensen et al, 2022; Welsh, 2023). Administrators’ biases contribute to their adherence to specific response guidelines and are associated with racial disparities in the severity of the consequences students receive, even for the same behaviors (Jarvis & Okonofua, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%