2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01745-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating the body of literature assessing BRCA1/2 mutations and markers of ovarian function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…age at sampling, chronic ovarian dysfunction such as PCOS, use of hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer affected or not) could interfere with the observed results. In a recent meta-analysis [ 40 ], nine papers reporting on AMH serum levels [ 10 , 17 , 18 , 20 23 , 23 , 25 ] were included and no overall significant association between BRCA mutation status and AMH was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…age at sampling, chronic ovarian dysfunction such as PCOS, use of hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer affected or not) could interfere with the observed results. In a recent meta-analysis [ 40 ], nine papers reporting on AMH serum levels [ 10 , 17 , 18 , 20 23 , 23 , 25 ] were included and no overall significant association between BRCA mutation status and AMH was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size, eligibility criteria and stimulation protocols all vary and only two studies adjusted for dosage of gonadotropin administered [ 43 , 44 ]. The previously mentioned meta-analysis included four papers and did not find any statistically significant difference in ovarian response [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Available data on PGT-M age-related outcomes suggest similar pattern as above, with highest success rates at an oocyte age 30-35 years, a moderate decline from age 35 to 40 years, and extremely limited success rates after age 40 years. 21,28,29 Furthermore, although data are mixed on the association of BRCA carrier status diminished ovarian reserve, [30][31][32] the mere suggestion of reduced and reproductive potential underscores the importance of fertility counseling as early as possible in the reproductive years. For both fertility preservation and preimplantation testing, early intervention translates to higher live birth rates.…”
Section: Preimplantation Genetic Testing For Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%