Navigating the Road to College: Race and Class Variation in the College Application Process

Abstract

College attendance brings significant financial gain in lifetime earnings, and in order to reap those benefits more students are attending college than ever before. At the same time as more students have been applying to college, the application process itself has changed dramatically in the last few decades. As the last hurdle on the road to college, the application process is a critical step in the overall college‐choice process. However, until recently much of the research on college choice gave little attention to the actual steps of college application and did not always attend to variations by race and class. Considering the increasing importance of a college education and the consistent inequalities by race and class in who attends college, research examining how social background affects the ways in which students navigate the college application process is crucial. This review examines what we do know about race and class variation in college application, drawing from literature across sociology, economics, and higher education. This review addresses three questions: how does the admissions and application process affect race and class inequalities in college attendance? How have scholars modeled this process and do these models capture the experiences of students across race and class? And finally, how do students from different social backgrounds vary in their approach to applying to college?

Improving Admission of Low-SES Students at Selective Colleges

“…Applicants from underresourced high schools have reduced access to the honors and Advanced Placement (AP) courses (Attewell & Domina, 2008; Klopfenstein, 2004; Perna, 2004) that are strong predictors of admission to selective colleges (Bastedo, Howard, & Flaster, 2016; Espenshade & Radford, 2009). These applicants are also less likely to have access to test preparation and knowledge about how to craft an effective college application, from writing personal statements to deciding on extracurricular activities (Buchmann, Condron, & Roscigno, 2010; Holland, 2014). Correspondence bias suggests that college admissions officers are likely to overlook these situational barriers and therefore provide recommendations for lower SES applicants that underestimate the value of their credentials.…”

“Why Wait Years to Become Something?” Low-income African American Youth and the Costly Career Search in For-profit Trade Schools

“…Yet for youth who lack resources and know-how, even small goals can be unattainable. This information poverty contributes to the social reproduction of inequality during the postsecondary transition, hurting youth who have modest aspirations just as it does youth who aim for jobs requiring bachelor’s degrees or more (Holland 2013; McCabe and Jackson 2016; McDonough 1997). Like the working-class young men Willis (1977) and MacLeod (1995) studied decades ago, these youth are active agents, navigating the postsecondary transition amid limited choices and profound structural constraints.…”

We Won’t Be Able to Find Jobs Here: How Growing Up in Rural America Shapes Decisions About Work

“…Sarah Damaske (2011) argues that middle-class girls typically view college as the only next step after high school, thus delaying decisions about work and family until after college-an opportunity that working-class girls seldom have. Working-class men may look toward work instead of college (Holland 2014;Ovink 2014).…”