2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating through incontinence: A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation of the experiences of family caregivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with research documenting experiences of incontinence in high income settings [25][26][27]. However, challenges related to managing incontinence appear to be 20,28].…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are consistent with research documenting experiences of incontinence in high income settings [25][26][27]. However, challenges related to managing incontinence appear to be 20,28].…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, challenges related to managing incontinence appear to be 20,28]. For example, in many high-income county settings there are professional care services, assistive products and devices, social protection schemes, health systems and formal or community-based support programmes which can help mitigate the costs and physical and mental toll of caring for a person with severe incontinence [25,[29][30][31]. While access and use of these services may still vary in high income settings, none of these support mechanisms were available to PWI or caregivers in our study.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study was included if the item of it achieved a minimum of 60% “yes” to guarantee the study showed acceptable quality. Studies were considered to possess acceptable quality if 60% of items were answered “yes,” to possess good quality if 70–90% of items were answered “yes,” and to maintain high quality if 100% of items were answered “yes” (Talley et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study was included if the item of it achieved a minimum of 60% ‘yes’ to guarantee the study showed acceptable quality. Studies were considered to possess acceptable quality if 60% of items were answered: ‘yes’, to possess good quality if 70%–90% of items were answered ‘yes’, and to have high quality if 100% of items were answered ‘yes’ (Talley et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the plausibility of these findings was rated by two researchers of our team independently. The finding was rated as ‘unequivocal’ if the congruence of the finding and the illustration accompanied was beyond a reasonable doubt, as ‘credible’ if lacking a clear association between them and as ‘unsupported’ if the findings were not supported by the data (Talley et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%