Advances in Unmanned Marine Vehicles 2006
DOI: 10.1049/pbce069e_ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigation, guidance and control of the Hammerhead autonomous underwater vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed multiple variable screening on the above nine new indicators and the longitude, latitude, and gravity anomaly values for machine learning classification prediction [6,7] . We finalize to divide the data into three parts: training set, validation set and test set, with 80%, 10% and 10% of data samples, respectively.…”
Section: Adaptation Zone Classification Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed multiple variable screening on the above nine new indicators and the longitude, latitude, and gravity anomaly values for machine learning classification prediction [6,7] . We finalize to divide the data into three parts: training set, validation set and test set, with 80%, 10% and 10% of data samples, respectively.…”
Section: Adaptation Zone Classification Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been demonstrated earlier in [12] where a nonlinear neural network based model of an AUV is integrated in the MPC control strategy. More details of the algorithm can be found in [14] and the block diagram of the controller is depicted in Fig. 5.…”
Section: B) Ga-mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedback for the controller was taken from the IMU as the IMU data are observed to G(q)= −0.042 26q−1+0.003 435q−2 1−1.765q−1+0.7652q−2 (5) be more accurate and reliable compared with the TCM2 data. For future trials, an MSDF algorithm [43] will provide an estimate of the true heading of the vehicle by where q−1 is the delay operator. This model has a pole very close to the unit circle which represents an combining the IMU and TCM2 outputs.…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%