1998
DOI: 10.1006/jagm.1997.0903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NC-Approximation Schemes for NP- and PSPACE-Hard Problems for Geometric Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
147
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
147
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As has already been argued in the introduction, there have been various NP-completeness proofs for wireless networks. To the best of our knowledge, these proofs are either built for the UDG model [15,19], or for the abstract SIN R model (SIN RA), and present reductions without a geometric representation. A typical such proof establishes an arbitrary gain matrix between the participating nodes, which results in a standard graph.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has already been argued in the introduction, there have been various NP-completeness proofs for wireless networks. To the best of our knowledge, these proofs are either built for the UDG model [15,19], or for the abstract SIN R model (SIN RA), and present reductions without a geometric representation. A typical such proof establishes an arbitrary gain matrix between the participating nodes, which results in a standard graph.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 It is also of interest to determine the complexity of Id Code and Loc-Dom Set for bipartite permutation graphs and unit interval graphs. Finally, we remark that Min Dominating Set admits PTAS algorithms for planar graphs [5] and for unit disk graphs [38,50]. Does the same hold for Min Id Code and Min Loc-Dom Set?…”
Section: Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[25] for an online database, and [20,35,36] for surveys and summaries). The log-APX-completeness of Min Dominating Set is known to hold even for bipartite graphs and split graphs [19], however it does not hold for planar graphs or unit disk graphs (for which Min Dominating Set admits PTAS algorithms [5,38,50]) or in (bipartite) graphs of bounded maximum degree (at least 3), where it is APX-complete [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several polynomial time approximation schemes exist as well [14,21,26,35,37,38]. Most of these schemes have in common that they use the so called shifting technique.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%