2011
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NCCN Biosimilars White Paper: Regulatory, Scientific, and Patient Safety Perspectives

Abstract: Biologics are essential to oncology care. As patents for older biologics begin to expire, the United States is developing an abbreviated regulatory process for the approval of similar biologics (biosimilars), which raises important considerations for the safe and appropriate incorporation of biosimilars into clinical practice for patients with cancer. The potential for biosimilars to reduce the cost of biologics, which are often high-cost components of oncology care, was the impetus behind the Biologics Price … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
182
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
182
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A white paper from 2011 introduced biosimilars from a regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspective (Zelenetz et al, 2011). Based on a survey of 277 providers, the paper also pointed to a low level of understanding of biosimilars.…”
Section: Implications For Advanced Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A white paper from 2011 introduced biosimilars from a regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspective (Zelenetz et al, 2011). Based on a survey of 277 providers, the paper also pointed to a low level of understanding of biosimilars.…”
Section: Implications For Advanced Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awareness of these upcoming changes may be of substantial value to clinicians, pharmacists, and patients and their caregivers to ensure that lower-cost alternatives enable savings within healthcare systems. [1][2][3][4][5][6] In this review, we provide an overview of the regulatory standards for the development and approval of biosimilars in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US), outlining some of the current differences and their potential implications, and we consider some of the challenges that arise for emerging countries in adopting the biosimilar regulatory paradigm pioneered in the EU/US. Further, we review a few of the key issues for biosimilars that are currently being discussed on a global basis by regulators, biosimilars developers, and other stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biosimilars are currently being used in clinical practice for the supportive care of patients with cancer, such as hematopoietic growth factors (e.g., erythropoietin, filgrastim). 1 In the next few years, a number of biologics used for the treatment of patients with cancer will lose exclusivity, including the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) trastuzumab, rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab. This loss of exclusivity enables biosimilar mAbs to be approved by regulatory authorities, and thus enter clinical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Biosimilar proteins such as haematopoietic growth factors (e.g., erythropoietin, filgrastim) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (e.g., infliximab) 2 are currently being used in clinical practice for the treatment of patients with cancer and immune-mediated disorders. In the next few years, a number of biologics will lose exclusivity, including trastuzumab, rituximab, cetuximab, bevacizumab and adalimumab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%