2008
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2008.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NCCN Task Force Report: Oral Chemotherapy

Abstract: Oral chemotherapy is emerging as a new option for well-selected patients who can manage potentially complex oral regimens and self-monitor for potential complications. If a choice between oral and parenteral therapy is available, patients may opt for oral chemotherapy because it is more convenient to administer, allows them to avoid multiple office visits, and gives them a sense of control over their own cancer care. Whether these potential advantages are maintained in regimens that combine oral and pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
282
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
282
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The availability of oral drugs for the treatment of cancer has increased in recent years, and it is estimated that approximately 25% of all anticancer agents currently in development will be available as oral formulations. 3 Largely, this phenomenon follows patient preferences, dictated by convenience. 4,5 Indeed, the avoidance of frequent trips to health care facilities, insertion of central venous lines, discomfort from infusion, and risks of associated adverse events, are not trivial advantages of oral cytotoxic therapies over traditional, intravenously administered ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The availability of oral drugs for the treatment of cancer has increased in recent years, and it is estimated that approximately 25% of all anticancer agents currently in development will be available as oral formulations. 3 Largely, this phenomenon follows patient preferences, dictated by convenience. 4,5 Indeed, the avoidance of frequent trips to health care facilities, insertion of central venous lines, discomfort from infusion, and risks of associated adverse events, are not trivial advantages of oral cytotoxic therapies over traditional, intravenously administered ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of oral chemotherapy agents adds the flexibility and convenience of self‐administration at home, prolonged drug exposure, and improved quality of life compared with traditional chemotherapy administered by intravenous infusion in a physician’s office or hospital outpatient clinic . However, the use of these agents also increases the risk of potential drug‐drug interactions, because many patients receive chemotherapy at standalone specialty pharmacies and receive other medications at other pharmacies, preventing the detection of drug‐drug interactions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some cancer medications may have a narrow therapeutic index, therefore conferring increased risks of adverse effects , and oral chemotherapy turns out to be as much at risk as i.v. forms . Unfortunately, the use of oral cancer treatment has expanded more quickly than the infrastructure required to ensure safe care, leading to a new challenge for cancer centres and for patients due to their lack of preparedness for side effects and their unfamiliarity with the possible techniques to mitigate drug toxicity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%