2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(02)00327-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NDF degradability of hays measured in situ and in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diet as total mixed ration (TMR) was given to sheep in two equal portions at 08:00 and 18:00 h. The polyester bag size for determination of DM disappearance was 12 × 19 cm, with a pore size of 50 µm. All samples were dried and milled through a 4.0-mm sieve (Spanghero et al, 2003;Yalchi and Kargar 2010). Then, 5 g of each sample was put in the nylon bags and incubated in the rumen for 2, 4, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. All bags were inserted at the same time, just before the morning feeding (08:00 h).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diet as total mixed ration (TMR) was given to sheep in two equal portions at 08:00 and 18:00 h. The polyester bag size for determination of DM disappearance was 12 × 19 cm, with a pore size of 50 µm. All samples were dried and milled through a 4.0-mm sieve (Spanghero et al, 2003;Yalchi and Kargar 2010). Then, 5 g of each sample was put in the nylon bags and incubated in the rumen for 2, 4, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. All bags were inserted at the same time, just before the morning feeding (08:00 h).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crude protein concentrations for the calibration samples were calculated as 6.25 times the total N concentration determined using a LECO FP-428 N analyzer (LECO Corporation). Calibration for IVTD was determined through a 48-h in vitro digestion, followed by washing with a neutral detergent fiber solution, as described by Spanghero et al (2003). A Daisy incubator and an ANKOM 200 Fiber Analyzer were used for this assay (ANKOM Technology,).…”
Section: Forage Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, IVNDFD explained 94% of the variability in ISNDFD values (Figure 1). In cattle, Spanghero et al [36] found a similar relationship, but on the contrary, the IVNDFD values were on average 19% higher than the effective in situ degradability of NDF. Robinson et al also reported higher IVNDFD than ISNDFD values at 48 h [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%