2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near field brine discharge modeling part 2: Validation of commercial tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results from Kikkert et al [8] and Oliver et al [30] as well as the integral modelling predictions from Palomar et al [15] are also included for comparison. From the figure, the normalized LES predictions with different Fr were similar to each other with slight divergences towards the downstream direction.…”
Section: Jet Trajectory and Overall Flow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental results from Kikkert et al [8] and Oliver et al [30] as well as the integral modelling predictions from Palomar et al [15] are also included for comparison. From the figure, the normalized LES predictions with different Fr were similar to each other with slight divergences towards the downstream direction.…”
Section: Jet Trajectory and Overall Flow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They compared their numerical results with those obtained from previous integral models and experimental observations, and concluded that the k-e predictions provided a more accurate representation of the mixing processes compared to the integral models. More recently, Palomar et al [15] reported an overview of the performances of some widely-used integral models, including CORMIX, VISUAL PLUMES and VISJET, on the analysis of inclined dense jets. Their study revealed significant discrepancies in the dilution predictions by these integral models for brine discharge modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modification of CorJet equationsCorJet predictions underestimate the experimentally obtained data for both trajectory and dilutions[17]. The model results can compare better to the observed data if CorJet equations…”
mentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Although IM can be also used for NBJ, their predictions concerning the jet rise height and dilutions are rather conservative, as it has been reported by Papanicolaou et al [21] and Palomar et al [17]. Papanicolaou et al [21] tried to cope with this lack of agreement between the predicted and experimental data by decreasing the jet entrainment coefficient (α j ) of their model by 30-47 %; this decrease gave better predictions of the NBJ geometrical characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…El estudio del proceso de mezcla con el medio receptor de estos vertidos hiperdensos (salmuera) es complejo y constituye un gran reto científico en la ingeniería hidráulica actual, dada la multitud de variables que intervienen en él [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified