2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-field plume-surface interaction and regolith erosion and dispersal during the lunar landing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation models of both stages are shown in Figure 2. Fluent software was used to simulate the two flow stages, which are verified as useful and effective in describing this type of flow when vacuum flow is near-field [28,29]. Figure 2a shows the nozzle geometry of the Chang'E-5 mission.…”
Section: Compressible Plume Flow Simulation Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation models of both stages are shown in Figure 2. Fluent software was used to simulate the two flow stages, which are verified as useful and effective in describing this type of flow when vacuum flow is near-field [28,29]. Figure 2a shows the nozzle geometry of the Chang'E-5 mission.…”
Section: Compressible Plume Flow Simulation Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant erosion mechanism adopted here is viscous erosion in the lunar environment. In this investigation, the Roberts erosion model, based on the viscous erosion model, is adopted to describe the lunar surface erosion characteristics of the Chang'E-5 mission [28]. In this model, if the lunar surface shear stress exceeds the critical stress, surface erosion will take place, and the mass erosion rate in this moment will be…”
Section: Lunar Surface Erosion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-particle forces arising from collisions and sliding/rolling friction vary based on the physical properties of the regolith. In recent years, Eulerian-based two-fluid models (Gale et al, 2017;Balakrishnan and Bellan, 2018;Gale et al, 2020;Balakrishnan and Bellan, 2019;Chinnappan et al, 2021;Balakrishnan and Bellan, 2021) and particle-based methods (He et al, 2012;Morris et al, 2015;Rahimi et al, 2020;Shallcross, 2021) of PSI have been conducted that explicitly account for these interactions. Yet, the underlying models these simulations are built upon (e.g., drag, subgrid scale turbulence, etc.)…”
Section: Multiphase Flow Dynamics During Psimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature of the ambient gas and cylinder walls was assumed to be constant (273 K). Figure 3 compares the shear stress and heat flux measured along the surface of the cylinder for argon at M = 5.0 and Kn = 0.005 [33,49]. It is seen that the numerical errors consistently decrease with larger grid refinements.…”
Section: Grid Independent Studymentioning
confidence: 99%