“…For the past few decades, super-resolution fluorescence imaging has mainly located in the visible and several used near-infrared I light range ( Jin et al, 2018 ). Compared with the visible, red-shifting fluorophores including NIR I (650–950 nm) and NIR-II (1,000–1700 nm) light, would bear several virtues: 1) far-red light has lower scattering across tissues, enhancing tissue penetration and imaging depth; 2) auto-fluorescence caused by the excitation of molecules, like flavins or haemoglobin, is usually reduced in red-shifted wavelengths; 3) absorption of far-red light is less by the tissue when compared to shorter excitations, causing less phototoxic impact ( Lei and Zhang, 2020 ; Reja et al, 2021 ). Thus, shifting the excitation and emission wavelength of the probe to the red spectral region is necessary for in vivo imaging.…”