2020
DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Infrared Light Increases Functional Connectivity with a Non-thermal Mechanism

Abstract: Although techniques for non-invasive brain stimulation are under intense investigation, an approach that has received limited attention is transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM), the delivery of near-infrared light to the brain with a laser or light-emitting diode (LED) directed at the scalp. Here we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the Blood-Oxygenation-Level Dependent (BOLD) signal in n = 20 healthy human participants while concurrently stimulating their right frontal pole wit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the thermo_stim given in this study generated equivalent heating on the subject’s forehead, it does not rule out heating of the brain as a mechanism. However, a recent study by Dmochowski et al employed magnetic resonance thermometry to measure brain temperature during 10-min tPBM ( n = 20) with 808-nm laser and found no significant temperature differences between active and sham stimulation 62 . Another group conducted computer simulations of motor cortex tPBM with 500 mW/cm 2 at three wavelengths (630 nm, 700 nm, and 810 nm) 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the thermo_stim given in this study generated equivalent heating on the subject’s forehead, it does not rule out heating of the brain as a mechanism. However, a recent study by Dmochowski et al employed magnetic resonance thermometry to measure brain temperature during 10-min tPBM ( n = 20) with 808-nm laser and found no significant temperature differences between active and sham stimulation 62 . Another group conducted computer simulations of motor cortex tPBM with 500 mW/cm 2 at three wavelengths (630 nm, 700 nm, and 810 nm) 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We showed in our previous studies that tPBM promoted both con-centrations of ∆[oxCCO] and ∆[HbO] linearly in amplitude [34,36], without knowing their coherent or coherence relationship. It is also known that tPBM would release nitric oxide (NO) which stimulates vessel dilation [78]. Accordingly, we speculated two sources contributing to our measured ∆[HbO] by bbNIRS: one was a ∆[oxCCO]-driven component [34] and the other a vessel-dilation-driven component.…”
Section: Tpbm-induced Alteration In Bilateral Functional Connectivity and Unilateral Coherence In Iso Of [Hbo] And [Oxcco]mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Different imaging modalities have been utilized concurrently with tPBM administration to investigate its effects on the brain, such as electroencephalography (EEG) (Wang et al, 2019;Ghaderi et al, 2021), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Vargas et al, 2017;Dmochowski et al, 2020), broadband near-infrared spectroscopy (bbNIRS) (Tian et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017b;Pruitt et al, 2020;Saucedo et al, 2021), or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) (Holmes et al, 2019;Urquhart et al, 2020b). Among them, NIRS (both fNIRS and bbNIRS) has been considered as an effective and noninvasive tool for assessing the hemodynamic (Villringer et al, 1993;Boas and Franceschini, 2011;Quaresima et al, 2012;Boas et al, 2014;Scholkmann et al, 2014) and metabolic state of the brain (Villringer et al, 1993;Smith, 2011;Tian et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novel findings of this publication included (1) quantification of ISO powers of [HbO], (2) ISOspecific functional connectivity (FC) across the whole cortex, and (3) global topographical network metrics at three ISO frequency bands. A few existing tPBM-related studies assessed FC computed from EEG (Zomorrodi et al, 2019;Ghaderi et al, 2021), fMRI (Dmochowski et al, 2020;Naeser et al, 2020), or broad-frequency fNIRS (Urquhart et al, 2020b), but not frequency-specific fNIRS. Therefore, the current work would help answer two key questions: Does tPBM modulate FC differently at different ISO frequencies?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%