1989
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79082-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Analyzing Undried Silage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
2
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
20
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These researchers concluded that NIRS can be used for estimating ADF, NDF and IVOMD with good accuracy; however they did not present external validation data for digestibility. Reeves et al (1989) found R 2 and RPD P estimates of 0.83 and 2.41 for CP, 0.87 and 2.72 for ADF, 0.82 and 2.61 for NDF and 0.82 and 1.46 for IVOMD, respectively, what indicates NIRS prediction parameters poorer than those obtained in this work.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These researchers concluded that NIRS can be used for estimating ADF, NDF and IVOMD with good accuracy; however they did not present external validation data for digestibility. Reeves et al (1989) found R 2 and RPD P estimates of 0.83 and 2.41 for CP, 0.87 and 2.72 for ADF, 0.82 and 2.61 for NDF and 0.82 and 1.46 for IVOMD, respectively, what indicates NIRS prediction parameters poorer than those obtained in this work.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar values of R 2 for CP (0.90), and smaller values for IVOMD, ADF and NDF (0.40,0.81 and 0.84,respectively) were shown by Cozzolino et al (2006) in comparison with results of this work (Table 3). Reeves et al (1989) achieved similar R 2 values for CP (0.83), ADF (0.86) and NDF (0.85) and smaller values for IVOMD (0.53) than in this work (Table 3). Park et al (2005) also reported values of calibration parameters R 2 and SECV in silage maize (0.96 and 1.05 for ADF, 0.93 and 2.14 for NDF, and 0.88 and 0.29 for CP, respectively), which were similar to those obtained in this study (Table 3), whereas their estimates 0.92 and 1.73 for IVOMD were better than those found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These problems can be overcome by grinding silages in frozen state with dry ice or liquid nitrogen, but such a procedure is time-consuming and inconvenient due to cleanup required between samples and the need to thaw the sample for subsequent use (Park et al, 2002;Reeves et al, 1989). Also, advances in chemometrics software, spectral data transformation for scatter correction and partial least squares regression have minimized some of the interference of particle size variation and water absorption presented by wet silage samples (Baker et al, 1994;Gordon et al, 1998;Shenk and Westerhaus, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in recent years researchers prefer to do a NIRS-analysis on the undried silage, although there remain other problems like the heterogeneity of the samples and the effect of water. In order to overcome this problem, Reeves and Blosser (1989) used dry ice or liquid N to grind the silage sample, but there is also very complicated. It was concluded that when not using dry ice, the undried silage samples treated in a wiley grinder gave better calibration results than that treated in a Hobart chopper and intact materails, and even intact silage samples could be used for CP determination (Reeves and Blosser, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%