2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-infrared speckle interferometry and radiative transfer modelling of the carbon star LP Andromedae

Abstract: We present the near-infrared speckle interferometry for LP And in the H and K bands with diffraction-limited resolutions of 56 and 72 mas, new JHKLM photometry, and the results of our radiative transfer modelling of this carbon star. The reconstructed visibility reveals a sphericallysymmetric envelope surrounding the central star. To determine the physical parameters of the latter and the properties of its dusty envelope, we performed extensive radiative transfer calculations. The well-defined spectral energy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Periods are mainly taken from the Combined General Catalogue of Variable stars (Samus et al 2004). The periods for LP And, AFGL 3068, and IK Tau are from Men'shchikov et al (2006), Le Bertre (1992), and González Delgado et al (2003), respectively. Distances are derived by fitting the spectral energy distribution (SED) calculated with DUSTY (Sect.…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Periods are mainly taken from the Combined General Catalogue of Variable stars (Samus et al 2004). The periods for LP And, AFGL 3068, and IK Tau are from Men'shchikov et al (2006), Le Bertre (1992), and González Delgado et al (2003), respectively. Distances are derived by fitting the spectral energy distribution (SED) calculated with DUSTY (Sect.…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous mass-loss-rate estimates from CO radio lines have resulted in mass-loss rates close to our results, 1.2 × 10 −5 M ⊙ yr −1 (CO/H 2 =1.1 × 10 −3 ) (Teyssier et al 2006), and 1.5 × 10 −5 M ⊙ yr −1 (Schöier & Olofsson 2001), both assuming a distance of 630 pc. Men'shchikov et al (2006) estimated the mass-loss rate to be 1.9 × 10 −5 M ⊙ yr −1 from a dust radiative transfer model, assuming a distance of 740 pc and a dust-to-gas mass ratio of 0.0039. The corresponding mass-loss rate at the distance used and the dust-to-gas ratio obtained in our model, would be 1.1 × 10 −5 M ⊙ yr −1 , in good agreement with our result.…”
Section: Lp Andmentioning
confidence: 99%