2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration as an alternative to the Agtron to predict roasting degrees in coffee beans and ground coffees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After drying, 8 kg of dry parchment coffee (DPC) was obtained; this mass was then hulled to remove the endocarp (parchment), from which 720 g were peaberries. Then, the green coffee was roasted in a PROBAT sample roaster, four 150 g samples of peaberries and four 150 g samples of standard beans were used for the cupping analysis while the rest of the coffee was used for the different tests, the initial drum temperature was 200°C, and the samples were roasted during 12 minutes at a constantly increasing temperature 25°C – 225°C until reaching a medium‐high roasting profile with a color level of 55 agtron (Pires et al, 2021), the medium‐high roasting degree was chosen to detect easier and see the roasting tonality differences due to the contrast generated between the colours (Darmajana et al, 2022; Odzakovic et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After drying, 8 kg of dry parchment coffee (DPC) was obtained; this mass was then hulled to remove the endocarp (parchment), from which 720 g were peaberries. Then, the green coffee was roasted in a PROBAT sample roaster, four 150 g samples of peaberries and four 150 g samples of standard beans were used for the cupping analysis while the rest of the coffee was used for the different tests, the initial drum temperature was 200°C, and the samples were roasted during 12 minutes at a constantly increasing temperature 25°C – 225°C until reaching a medium‐high roasting profile with a color level of 55 agtron (Pires et al, 2021), the medium‐high roasting degree was chosen to detect easier and see the roasting tonality differences due to the contrast generated between the colours (Darmajana et al, 2022; Odzakovic et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study tested modeling by leaving one cross-validation model with ratio data calibration to validation around 80%:10%. The model's interpretation was determined using the coefficient correlation of calibration and validation, root means square error of calibration (RMSEC), and root means square error of prediction (RMSEP) as specified by Pires et al [16]. Additionally, the error difference between RMSEC and RMSEP and the ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD) were analyzed using the Caporaso et al [17] equation.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike direct measurement techniques used in chemical analysis, spectral analysis serves as an indirect method. It necessitates the integration with chemometric methods to construct a model that captures the correlation between the sample and its spectral data [13]. At present, the predominant chemometric methods include Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost), Random Forest (RF), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%