2014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring of the collateral network to detect spinal cord malperfusion during and after thoracoabdominal aortic repair: A clinical update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review, Uchida 10 showed an average SCI rate of 4.5% (range, 0%-10.3 %) in 7309 TEVAR patients, suggesting that endoluminal procedures are not superior to the open approach, especially compared with the rate at aortic centers performing a high volume of open repairs. 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 Endoluminal approaches avoid aortic cross-clamping and most of the intraoperative hemodynamic changes but prevent reimplantation of the intercostal arteries covered by the stent graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review, Uchida 10 showed an average SCI rate of 4.5% (range, 0%-10.3 %) in 7309 TEVAR patients, suggesting that endoluminal procedures are not superior to the open approach, especially compared with the rate at aortic centers performing a high volume of open repairs. 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 Endoluminal approaches avoid aortic cross-clamping and most of the intraoperative hemodynamic changes but prevent reimplantation of the intercostal arteries covered by the stent graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of SCI after TEVAR is not significantly lower than that after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. [25] However, delayed paralysis/paralysis is the primary manifestation of SCI after TEVAR, as compared with open abdominal surgery. [26] While the pathogenesis of SCI after TEVAR is multifactorial and not fully understood, 2 theories regarding the mechanism of SCI have been suggested: the first relates to inadequate remodeling of the collateral blood network to maintain spinal cord viability, whereas the second refers to atheroembolisation of aortic plaque material into the segmental arteries supplying the spinal cord.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the outcomes with regard to the neurological function did not worsen even after the second TES. There have been several studies which have indicated that occlusion of the segmental 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64arteries leads to the development of collateral pathways of intraspinal and paraspinous arteries and arterioles [13][14][15][16], and these collateral pathways developed within five days after occlusion in those cases. These studies may explain the reasons for the preservation of the neurological function after the multiple-level embolization of the segmental arteries in our case series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%