1990
DOI: 10.1016/0042-207x(90)90156-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-interface concentration reduction in n-type Au/CrGaAs Schottky contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, the theoretical curves published by Sze and Gibbons [19] and the experimental data published by other workers [11±13] in dierent growth techniques are also shown. From this ®gure it is seen that the depletion layer widths derived by several workers [12,13] are agreeing with each other except for the work done by Horvath et al [11] in the vapor-phase (VPE) growth process of planar diodes. From Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, the theoretical curves published by Sze and Gibbons [19] and the experimental data published by other workers [11±13] in dierent growth techniques are also shown. From this ®gure it is seen that the depletion layer widths derived by several workers [12,13] are agreeing with each other except for the work done by Horvath et al [11] in the vapor-phase (VPE) growth process of planar diodes. From Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Despite some scatter in the experimental data points arising from the low doping level material, reasonably good agreement was observed with the experimental data presented by Baliga et al [13] using the vapor and liquid phase epitaxially grown materials. However, the breakdown voltages measured by Horvath et al [11] either in planar or mesa diodes were far below from the theoretical curves. They pointed out that this may be due to very large defect densities greater than 1 Â 10 6 cm À2 or may be due to the surface/interface eects or the edge eect in¯uences the breakdown at low concentrations [17,24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…When molar ratio increases (i.e. iodine concentration decreases) the effect of the interfacial layer minimise accordingly, and thus the barrier height reduces and reached its minimum value for NRI-12 M material [34]. For higher molar ratios, the majority of the doped iodine does not play as charge acceptors.…”
Section: Investigation Of Saturation Current Density Ideality Factormentioning
confidence: 99%