2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c05910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-IR Charge-Transfer Emission at 77 K and Density Functional Theory Modeling of Ruthenium(II)-Dipyrrinato Chromophores: High Phosphorescence Efficiency of the Emitting State Related to Spin–Orbit Coupling Mediation of Intensity from Numerous Low-Energy Singlet Excited States

Abstract: Efficient charge-transfer (CT) phosphorescence in the near-IR (NIR) spectral region is reported for four substituted Ru-(R-dipyrrinato) complexes, [Ru(bpy) 2 (R-dipy)](PF 6 ), where bpy is 2,2′-bipyridine and the substituent R is phenyl (ph), 2,4,6trimethylphenyl, 4-carboxyphenyl (HOOC-ph), or 4-pyridinyl. The experimentally determined phosphorescence efficiency, ι em(p) = k RAD(p) /(ν em(p) ) 3 (where k RAD(p) and ν em(p) are the phosphorescence rate constant and the phosphorescence frequency, respectively), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the labile Cl 4h. [62][63][64] This phenomenon also was corroborated by the fact that the novel fluorescence emission signal displayed bathochromic shifts from complex 1 to 4 with emission peaks at 709, 723, 724, and 744 nm, respectively, in agreement with the electron-donating abilities as the discussion above for the DFT calculations part. Additionally, there was a saturation effect for the Ru(II)-DNA complexes because the decreasing intensities of the emission peaks were not in a linear relationship with the increase in concentrations of Ru(II) complexes.…”
Section: Dalton Transactions Papersupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, the labile Cl 4h. [62][63][64] This phenomenon also was corroborated by the fact that the novel fluorescence emission signal displayed bathochromic shifts from complex 1 to 4 with emission peaks at 709, 723, 724, and 744 nm, respectively, in agreement with the electron-donating abilities as the discussion above for the DFT calculations part. Additionally, there was a saturation effect for the Ru(II)-DNA complexes because the decreasing intensities of the emission peaks were not in a linear relationship with the increase in concentrations of Ru(II) complexes.…”
Section: Dalton Transactions Papersupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Previous work concerning the DFT modeling of the emitting 3 MLCT (T e ) states for typical Ru-bpy complexes predominantly involved MLCT-(Ru-bpy) and some ππ*-bpy components for [Ru­(bpy)­(NH 3 ) 4 ] 2+ , ,,, [Ru­(bpy)­(en) 2 ] 2+ , and [Ru­(bpy) 2 (en)] 2+ , complexes. The selected low-energy NTO plots of the triplet excited states (T n ) with excited-state energies at the T e geometry for the target [Ru­(bpy) 2 (CM)] + ions are shown in Figures S3C1C (page S34), S3C2C (page S41), and S3C3C (page S50).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution to this issue is to reconsider the perturbation principle of molecular orbitals and SOC fundamentals. The NTO plots of the low-energy S n (T) states for the [Ru­(bpy) 2 (CM)] + ions (see Figures and ) and [Ru­(bpy)­(NH 3 ) 4 ] 2+ , ,,, [Ru­(bpy)­(en) 2 ] 2+ , and [Ru­(bpy) 2 (en)] 2+ , complexes show a significant contribution from the π-ligand component in the donor SOMOs related to the configurations between MLCT and ππ*-ligand states, suggesting that the efficient ∑ f EW(S n (T) ) in eq should include the influence of the perturbation of the configuration of low-energy 1 MLCT and high-energy 1 ππ states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations