2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-offset effects on Rayleigh-wave dispersion measurements: Physical modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the source-receiver distance is small, effective dispersion curve is determined by the amplitudes of multiple dispersion modes. While for small spread length or low frequency, the phase slowness resolution becomes unstable (Bodet et al, 2009). This effect is called "spread length effect".…”
Section: Effective Dispersion Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the source-receiver distance is small, effective dispersion curve is determined by the amplitudes of multiple dispersion modes. While for small spread length or low frequency, the phase slowness resolution becomes unstable (Bodet et al, 2009). This effect is called "spread length effect".…”
Section: Effective Dispersion Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, it improved the S/N ratio in dispersion data construction. Last, it may avoid the unwrapping effect at low frequency by selecting reasonable spread length (Bodet et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effective Dispersion Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For θ=0° and θ=15°, the three curves matched well at most frequencies except for the extremely low frequencies. Such mismatch at extremely low frequencies is mainly caused by near-field effects (Bodet et al, 2009;Rix, 2006, 2004;Lin and Chang, 2004). Their composed dispersion curve can be understood as the ground truth.…”
Section: Raw Data and Dispersion Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Near-field effects" and "spreading length effects" are therefore the major effects concluded by some research works. For the near-field effects, the near-offset of the spread may affect the phase unwrapping at the extremely low frequencies of the dispersion curve (Bodet et al, 2009;Rix, 2006, 2004;Lin and Chang, 2004). For the spreading length effects, the resolution of phase velocity is naturally determined by the spread length (Bodet et al, 2009(Bodet et al, , 2005Forbriger, 2003;O'Neill, 2003); long spreading length is beneficial for obtaining high-resolution dispersion data of surface waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tokimatsu et al (1992a,b) and Lai and Rix (1999) have proposed the expressions of the effective phase velocity, which take into account the higher modes but ignore the near-field effects. The near-field effect can be investigated via analytical methods, numerical methods, physical modeling and field testing (Zywicki and Rix, 2005;Strobbia and Foti, 2006;Bodet et al, 2009;Yoon and Rix, 2009). It has been recognized that the near-field effect can be mitigated by using the cylindrical beamformer and multi-offset phase analyses, or by increasing the total number of receivers and the array center distance in an array-based testing (Zywicki and Rix, 2005;Strobbia and Foti, 2006;Yoon and Rix, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%